Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:21 pm  

I can see him signing for wire or the pies and coming back and rubbing it in our faces

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:41 pm  

Saints4eva2013 wrote:

I can see him signing for wire or the pies and coming back and rubbing it in our faces

Those teams both have players in the half back and full back shirts, though - and they'll not have much salary cap space. I'd say someone like Salford or Bradford would be more likely.

If they're not intending to use him, why not loan him out?

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:01 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Those teams both have players in the half back and full back shirts, though - and they'll not have much salary cap space. I'd say someone like Salford or Bradford would be more likely.

If they're not intending to use him, why not loan him out?

I was talking about next season wire will want replace bries and hodgeson and I could see wane playing smith at hooker

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:18 pm  

Saints4eva2013 wrote:

I can see him signing for wire or the pies and coming back and rubbing it in our faces

I think he sign for one of the big clubs maybe not wire or wigan I say Leeds hull or Huddersfield

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:18 pm  

1984saints wrote:

I think he sign for one of the big clubs maybe not wire or wigan I say Leeds hull or Huddersfield

If he goes I'd say Wigan or Warrington myself

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:22 pm  

Saints4eva2013 wrote:

I was talking about next season wire will want replace bries and hodgeson and I could see wane playing smith at hooker

Gaskell' s not really a first receiver like smith, though, and Wane loves McIlorum.
Fullback for either Wire or Wigan is a possibility - Hodgeson may retire and Stomkins may get poached (as the media have alluded to).

Re: Gaskell : Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:36 am  

SomersetSaint wrote:

He is in his third season as a first team member. How many more seasons do you want to give him?

That doesn't exactly wash though does it.

he was first choice stand-off for half a season and did well. He then had the first 6 or 7 games last season and was one of our better performers then the coach gets sacked and the new coach drops him without giving him a game then he gets the odd scrap here and there.

The next season new coach 3 games behind a beaten pack and he's dropped!

It doesn't make sense - as somebody else has said Lance didn't do HALF as much in three times as many games and still gets picked!

Re: Gaskell : Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:39 am  

They have to justify Lance's wage I suppose...

Re: Gaskell : Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:27 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

They have to justify Lance's wage I suppose...

Be no point paying all that money to have him not playing

Re: Gaskell : Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:00 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

They have to justify Lance's wage I suppose...

It's obvious that the coach has gone for what he thinks is his best choice no.6 in Hohia. It's also also a fact that Gaskell is known to go hiding. That can't be allowed to happen. Last Friday, 1 to 17 worked as a unit, why change it?