Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:03 pm  

(Saint) wrote:

You're right, of course. But for an all St Helens coaching team, St Helens chairman (and a St Helens captain!) to endorse our current playing style is sacrilegious. You'd think they'd understand as well as any fan...

Both Wello's and Eamon's programme columns made me laugh as well. McManus clearly actually believes this squad is capable of winning trophies and that it was Royce's fault we didn't.

Wello on the other hand used his column to try and justify his contract extension. He mentioned Warrington's old guard of Briers, Morley and Hodgson getting new deals and hinted that there are no talented players available anywhere in the world so why not keep them? He so closely paraphrased a couple of people on here that I'm convinced that one of the pro-Wellens camp on here is actually Paul himself, all I need to do now is work out which one.

I can't wait to read Eamon's programme notes at the start of next season if we've still not signed a halfback, a prop or sorted the fullback spots out. He'll no doubt pay hommage to Wello's scintilating attacking prowess and call him the best fullback in the world like he did earlier in the year. Meanwhile the ambitious clubs will share the trophies and we'll no doubt sack Nathan Brown before the end of his second year.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:24 pm  

I'm Paul Wellens.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:28 pm  

(Saint) wrote:

You're right, of course. But for an all St Helens coaching team, St Helens chairman (and a St Helens captain!) to endorse our current playing style is sacrilegious. You'd think they'd understand as well as any fan...

To be fair, what else would you expect them to say? "We've made a series of monumental cock-ups in coaching appointments the last few years, are in a mess because of it and are now stuck with a limited youth team coach who can only play 1-dimensional, ultra dull, safety first rugby as a result, but just keep turning up and paying us to see this **** anyway please"?

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:30 pm  

Northampton_Saint wrote:

To be fair, what else would you expect them to say? "We've made a series of monumental cock-ups in coaching appointments the last few years, are in a mess because of it and are now stuck with a limited youth team coach who can only play 1-dimensional, ultra dull, safety first rugby as a result, but just keep turning up and paying us to see this **** anyway please"?

Fair point. There's plenty of 'typical RL player cliché interview' ways to say that we were below par at the weekend though.

"Wasn't the best game for the fans but we did the job" etc. etc.

He could only say what he said if he genuinely believed it. And that's worrying.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:57 pm  

I don't think its Saints that is the problem. The powers in their infinite wisdom are allowing the ruck to be slowed down. I believe in order to bring us closer to the Aussies.

Personally however, if its going to lead to seasons of dull games I say sod the internationals because its ruining a good sport.

Saints have just had to adapt as our main method of play has been made ineffective, by changes in the refing of games.

I seriously was contemplating whether to renew my season ticket this year because to be frank, not many games have been worth the entrance fee.

Northampton_Saint wrote:

To be fair, what else would you expect them to say? "We've made a series of monumental cock-ups in coaching appointments the last few years, are in a mess because of it and are now stuck with a limited youth team coach who can only play 1-dimensional, ultra dull, safety first rugby as a result, but just keep turning up and paying us to see this **** anyway please"?

Well personally telling us how it is and how they are going to do something next season to fix it, may make the decision to renew my season ticket easier. But if we are going to defend this brand of Rugby well, the heart says yes but the head say keep the money.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:04 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/19396251

Read Mike Rush's comments regarding LMS. No wonder we are so dull to watch.

Well to be fair LMS was the only one who looked up for the game.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:22 pm  

smileysmiles wrote:

I don't think its Saints that is the problem. The powers in their infinite wisdom are allowing the ruck to be slowed down. I believe in order to bring us closer to the Aussies.

Personally however, if its going to lead to seasons of dull games I say sod the internationals because its ruining a good sport.

Saints have just had to adapt as our main method of play has been made ineffective, by changes in the refing of games.

I agree to an extent, but at the same time, our style of play should the ruck be sped back up would clearly be based around Roby ripping slow-retreating defenders to shreds around the play the ball. I don't think it would solve the problem of how unimaginitive we are and how unable we are to break down opposition defences close to the line. It would however result in a faster more open spectacle with gaps on the field which is the game we all grew up watching. Can see both sides really.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:25 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

I'm Paul Wellens.

Your reactions are too quick. You responded in 21 minutes, it would take Wello that long to bend down to pick his laptop up.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:33 pm  

(Saint) wrote:

I agree to an extent, but at the same time, our style of play should the ruck be sped back up would clearly be based around Roby ripping slow-retreating defenders to shreds around the play the ball. I don't think it would solve the problem of how unimaginitive we are and how unable we are to break down opposition defences close to the line. It would however result in a faster more open spectacle with gaps on the field which is the game we all grew up watching. Can see both sides really.

Forget anything else at the end of the day I support Saints. The last few years with this attempt to bring us in line with the Aussies have seen the spectacle that is RL in this country dwindle. I never was a big fan of watching NRL and it pains me to see us trying to emulate them. At the end of the day when you have lots of people leaving a stadium after having paid good money walk out unfulfilled 'BTW that does not mean winning' its just not good for saints or the game as a whole.

Re: 30 -0 : Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:39 pm  

The thing is balance. Super league was too quick when we had Roby/KC/Higham ravaging sides up the middle. They then spotted this and went far too far the other way. Teams like Wigan under Maguire and Warrington under Smith get so many men into the tackle that they can slow it down to 10 second play the balls, meaning the defensive line is well and truly set and that there is no momentum at all.

Super League just doesn't have the calibre of creative player to have the game as slow as it is now. The few close games in semis and finals are won by which side is the most aggressive and the side that makes the least errors and kicks better. As a viewing spectacle the NRL is great only because the calibre of player is so much higher. Super League is, on the whole, incredibly boring to watch now as the standard is so low, there are so many errors and penalties and the play the balls are so drawn out.