Re: How sweet was that : Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:53 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18855004

Just makes it sweeter

I assume that's the case for every side that doesn't make Wembley.

There was a discussion on the Wigan board over which final was more financially beneficial to reach. Unfortunately no one could provide any conclusive evidence either way.

If Ian Lenegan is correct in his statement, I'd be very surprised if the GF was worth more. Although it perhaps should be IMO, as it is widely acknowledged as the bigger of the two.

Re: How sweet was that : Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:55 pm  

LovesToSpooge wrote:

I assume that's the case for every side that doesn't make Wembley.

There was a discussion on the Wigan board over which final was more financially beneficial to reach. Unfortunately no one could provide any conclusive evidence either way.

If Ian Lenegan is correct in his statement, I'd be very surprised if the GF was worth more. Although it perhaps should be IMO, as it is widely acknowledged as the bigger of the two.

I would have thought the challenge cup final would be the big earner.

Re: How sweet was that : Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:29 am  

Top Saint wrote:

Unfortunately for you, come next season, you won't have the team to do it!!!

Mystic Mug!

Re: How sweet was that : Wed Jul 18, 2012 4:32 pm  

St pete wrote: I would have thought the challenge cup final would be the big earner. It is indeed the bigger earner for the club, particularly in terms of merchandise sales. Check Wires accounts for 2009 and 2010. http://www.duedil.com/company/03683966/ ... financials

St pete wrote: I would have thought the challenge cup final would be the big earner. It is indeed the bigger earner for the club, particularly in terms of merchandise sales. Check Wires accounts for 2009 and 2010. http://www.duedil.com/company/03683966/ ... financials

Re: How sweet was that : Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:52 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote: It is indeed the bigger earner for the club, particularly in terms of merchandise sales. Check Wires accounts for 2009 and 2010. http://www.duedil.com/company/03683966/ ... financials Which as in keeping with the thread makes it all the more sweet. It helps dull the pain of us not making it this year.

Rogues Gallery wrote: It is indeed the bigger earner for the club, particularly in terms of merchandise sales. Check Wires accounts for 2009 and 2010. http://www.duedil.com/company/03683966/ ... financials Which as in keeping with the thread makes it all the more sweet. It helps dull the pain of us not making it this year.

Re: How sweet was that : Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:18 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Which as in keeping with the thread makes it all the more sweet. It helps dull the pain of us not making it this year.

It does for us as well.
Saints potential loss for not getting there is even more than ours.

Re: How sweet was that : Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:28 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

It does for us as well.
Saints potential loss for not getting there is even more than ours.

Still haven't got it have you old man. This is a Saints board and this thread is us being very very satisfied Leeds handed you your arrogant ar$es. The little extra's like you losing money just adds icing to the cake jog on kitty

Re: How sweet was that : Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:25 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Still haven't got it have you old man. This is a Saints board and this thread is us being very very satisfied Leeds handed you your arrogant ar$es. The little extra's like you losing money just adds icing to the cake jog on kitty

You can't lose money if you never had it in the first place

Re: How sweet was that : Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:32 pm  

Coventry Bears wrote:

You can't lose money if you never had it in the first place

very true It should have said 'losing out' on