Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:31 pm  

CORNISH wrote:

10???????????

No. Our first choice half back with his kicking game which was our biggest weakness today imo.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:47 pm  

How forward was Hornes pass to Yeaman!!
Cant believe the "neutrals" aren't bringing that one up.
Well played the "A" team anyway,great resolve again.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:48 pm  

We can bang on all night about forward passes,penalties ,injuries,etc,etc,.Nothing is going to change.As far as I am concerned it was a tremendous match,played in a good spirit.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:49 pm  

Bal wrote:

No. Our first choice half back with his kicking game which was our biggest weakness today imo.

, try having 5 halfbacks out.

You had 3 injuries, we had 10. Its not comparable whatsoever.

Long, Radford and who else?

Wellens, Pryce, Flannery, Moore, Clough, Wheeler, Lomax, Gaskell, Forster, Makinson.


I would't come to this board complaining about injuries if I was you. Just be glad we saw a great game of rugby.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:53 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

:lol: , try having 5 halfbacks out.

You had 3 injuries, we had 10. Its not comparable whatsoever.

Long, Radford and who else?

Wellens, Pryce, Flannery, Moore, Clough, Wheeler, Lomax, Gaskell, Forster, Makinson.


I would't come to this board complaining about injuries if I was you. Just be glad we saw a great game of rugby.

I posted elsewhere,you Saints fans are quite lucky i.m.o. in that your club always seem to find good players,even if some are injured.You steamrollered us second half,and I feel glad that our lads stuck in there and didn`t crumble under the pressure.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 5:54 pm  

barton baird wrote:

I posted elsewhere,you Saints fans are quite lucky i.m.o. in that your club always seem to find good players,even if some are injured.You steamrollered us second half,and I feel glad that our lads stuck in there and didn`t crumble under the pressure.

You're right we do seem to have a fantastic production line that can bring in young players to fill a void to some extent. I would like to see a fully fit team at some point this season though.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 6:00 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

I'd happily give that penalty up and take the obvious forward passes leading to 2 of Hulls tries. We should have won but we didnt and a point isnt bad considering the injury situation, end of really.

2 forward passes? The one for Yeamans third was dubious but the others were all fine.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 6:01 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

You're right we do seem to have a fantastic production line that can bring in young players to fill a void to some extent. I would like to see a fully fit team at some point this season though.

I am sure you would mate.We pay our money to see the best in S.L. whoever they play for.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 6:01 pm  

Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:

2 forward passes? The one for Yeamans third was dubious but the others were all fine.

Nah,the wind caught it.

Re: Hull game : Mon May 02, 2011 6:04 pm  

barton baird wrote:

I am sure you would mate.We pay our money to see the best in S.L. whoever they play for.

you and we are seeing the future best playing now.our youngsters can all be proud of their performances thus far.