Re: Gaskell : Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:19 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

Not if he wants to pay his mortgage - this sort of stuff will be in his contract.

Here's hoping he can take his next chance, but he's currently living off form from two years ago.

Or living off form from 6 games ago???

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:07 am  

1984saints wrote:

If the rumours are true he as turned a new contract down then he must have somewhere else lined up

If rumours are Anythin to go by he has most of the league after his signature but u seem nailed on his played his last game for saints and already has a club in mind

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:16 am  

Justme2011111 wrote:

If rumours are Anythin to go by he has most of the league after his signature but u seem nailed on his played his last game for saints and already has a club in mind

If he doesn't get a game against Salford then I can't see him playing for the club again they is a reason he ain't player its one of two brown doesn't rate him or something gone on behind closed doors the only people who know this is lee Nathan and the chairman

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:10 am  

1984saints wrote:

If he doesn't get a game against Salford then I can't see him playing for the club again they is a reason he ain't player its one of two brown doesn't rate him or something gone on behind closed doors the only people who know this is lee Nathan and the chairman

I hope he plays but for some strange reason like u said only lee brown and chairman knows whats going on but can't see him playing again if they don't intend on playing him rather realease him or sell him

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:26 pm  

Better to release or sell. Get some cash, or free up space in the salary. Save the rest of his salary to put a bid in for another player.

I like Gaskell, but pointless having a player who does not play.

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:43 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Better to release or sell. Get some cash, or free up space in the salary. Save the rest of his salary to put a bid in for another player.

I like Gaskell, but pointless having a player who does not play.

Saints won't sell him they would prefer him to run down is contract

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:48 pm  

1984saints wrote:

Saints won't sell him they would prefer him to run down is contract

Well that's just stupid surely it's better to get money for him then let him go for nothing

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:53 pm  

Or just to get his wages in the pocket if they can't sell him. But if there are a few teams in the running for him, then selling would be ideal.

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 1:31 pm  

There isn't a club in the league that wouldn't want to snap him up when he becomes available - in the current talent-starved market a young back with size, a kicking game and a bit of pace is golddust. But there's no point keeping him around if we've decided he isn't the half we can build a team around (as I've always doubted) for the next decade and we ain't going to use him. It'll be a bit sad to see him go but hardly earth shattering. If we can offload Hohaia and Wheeler at the same time somehow and get 2 new halves in from somewhere then everybody would be happy.

Re: Gaskell : Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:18 pm  

If the club won't sell or release him maybe they are hoping to keep him