Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:47 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

I'm surprised you are still alive to tell the tale.

It's easy, it's simply my charm, boyish good looks and huge...

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:24 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

About what? St Helens Council funding the building of our stadium? No, he isn't. He is entirely incorrect. They did not fund any part of our stadium. About the Billinge tax payers funding our stadium, as you apparently asserted? No, he isn't. He is entirely incorrect and so were you. The money used to cleanse the site and provide infrastructure was taken out of the capital budget, not the revenue budget, therefore Council tax was not touched.

He knows all of this. He has seen discussions about it before. He is just stirring things up to derail the thread.

Oh look. He's derailed the thread.

now who's being pedantic? and where does the capital budget come from?

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:55 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

now who's being pedantic? and where does the capital budget come from?

Investments, central government, etc.

That is, NOT the local taxpayer.

I'm far from being pedantic. The difference is significant.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:05 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Investments, central government, etc.

That is, NOT the local taxpayer.

I'm far from being pedantic. The difference is significant.

It is still not what I understand, perhaps all the true facts & documents need to be clearly made public, that is If St Helens Town FC are not going to be allowed to use the Stadium, and I am not being pedantic, a stadium should be used as much as possible! school finals, amateur finals, that is why Widnes Owner and Halton Council are going for the plastic pitch which I am sure a lot of other clubs will study!

I accept St Helens RLFC must always have first call if it is a Super League or Cup match!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:08 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Investments, central government, etc.

That is, NOT the local taxpayer.

I'm far from being pedantic. The difference is significant.

Have a couple of paracetamol with a nice Cranberry Juice, possibly take your mind away from the anger by doing the dishes and hoovering, even was and iron St Pete's smalls.

I'm joking BTW i love you really

Re: The wreckage from the derailed picture thread : Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:42 am  

Am not a great fan of threads being locked, but this one is a prime candidate IMO

Re: The wreckage from the derailed picture thread : Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:48 am  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Am not a great fan of threads being locked, but this one is a prime candidate IMO

Why? lock a thread when serious questions are being asked about the use of the stadium? not allowing the use of the stadium by St Helens Town FC, yes some are saying that No funding from any source has been given for the building etc and that is why Saints have the right to ban or stop the stadium being used for St Helens FC, all I am asking for is to see the evidence that No Funding was obtained at all which SaintsFan seems confident about. why stop truth being revealed?

Re: The wreckage from the derailed picture thread : Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:56 am  

Re: The wreckage from the derailed picture thread : Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:45 am  

The question that needs to be asked is, should the name St Helens on the stadium have a full stop after the St?

Re: The wreckage from the derailed picture thread : Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:05 pm  

roader wrote:

The question that needs to be asked is, should the name St Helens on the stadium have a full stop after the St?

YEP.