Re: Anthony Sullivan : Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:45 am  

brook40 wrote:

But thats just it he DIDNT want to be elsewhere his hand was forced by the tightwads that ran the club at the time.

Well, he wasn't forced into going to Canterbury but he wanted to go.

Still, as you suggest, we're going round in circles.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:46 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Well, he wasn't forced into going to Canterbury but he wanted to go.

Still, as you suggest, we're going round in circles.

Lots of players in that era went to Australia on short term contracts. The reason Connolly contemplated going there full time was that Saints WOULDN'T offer him a decent contract. Had he gone to Australia then Saints wouldn't have got a penny for him. Saints wouldn't give him the deal he wanted (much less that Wigan offered him) and decided to cash in.

Didn't Steve Prescott say something similar about the Saints board not wanting to reward local players?

What hasn't been mentioned is that Saints were in very poor financial state at that time and the £250 K was a big fee for them.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:03 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Well, he wasn't forced into going to Canterbury but he wanted to go.

Still, as you suggest, we're going round in circles.

honestly at times you arnt half thick. Were not going round in circles it's simple HE DIDNT WANT TO GO TO WIGAN BUT SAINTS FORCED HIM OUT. All the idiots who called him Judas should have been having a go at the board. As you stated you didnt watch Saints at the time so take it from someone who did the board we had then were short sighed and sold Gary to make a quick buck and thought they could replace him on the cheap .. they failed and we went backwards.

As he said in his interview all he really wanted to do back then was play for Saints and get paid a fair wage (obvious he wanted to stay as he offered to stay at Saints for less!!!!!). When presented with only 1 option (no bosman ruling back then) what could he do ? Retire?

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:37 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Lots of players in that era went to Australia on short term contracts.

De railing the thread a bit here but when you look back at the last time we were really close to the Aussies most of the GB team played off season down under.When the Mal Reilly episode was shown it struck me how many of that GB team had spent time in oz and how close we got to actually beating them.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:40 pm  

brook40 wrote:

De realing the thread a bit here but when you look back at the last time we were really close to the Aussies most of the GB team played off season down under.When the Mal Reilly episode was shown it struck me how many of that GB team had spent time in oz and how close we got to actually beating them.

yep, loads of top players went for spells over there. It helped them develop and I think it helped them mature a bit too. Have you read Chris Joint's book? IIRC he talks abit about it.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:19 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Well, he wasn't forced into going to Canterbury but he wanted to go.

Still, as you suggest, we're going round in circles.

It's you whose going round in a circle, you're making yourself sound daft. Listen to your clearly more informed fellow fans. Connolly was a huge loss for Saints. It beggars belief that his Dads house was attacked after he signed for Wigan.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:54 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Well he is from St. Helens.

Seriously though, I'm looking forward to next weeks programme, it should be very interesting, and maybe it'll put an end to the Judas thing when the real story comes out.
I've enjoyed most of those programmes with the possible exception of "how great I am" Bobby (Bobbie) Goulding.

Carney is very good in that interviewing role. I'd like too see the "out takes" though.

In relation to Judas, what he spouted was all one sided, It is a pity the Clubs side of the story was not forthcoming, How many clubs did he play for? he followed the money, not that I blame him, players have a short career and deserve all they monetary rewards they can muster.
Him trying to come on and try to play the nice guy does not cut any ice with me.
As for Gobblygook Carney, its no wonder RL is a laughing stock amongst most sporting fans. Rant Over.
Lookin forward to a great game at the weekend.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:00 pm  

Ovavoo wrote:

Listen to your clearly more informed fellow fans.

They are all just expressing an opinion. Everyone here has only got Connolly's story to go on plus the known fact that Saints sold him so no-one is 'more informed' than me. Either you believe his story or you don't. I don't. I thought he sounded insincere. He wanted the money and no club could pay the kind of wage Wigan were paying back then.

Connolly came across to me as someone who chased the money.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:50 am  

Poor mans Martin Offiah, enough said.

Re: Anthony Sullivan : Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:14 am  

21-12 wrote:

Poor mans Martin Offiah, enough said.

Has it taken you reading 6 pages of posts just to come up with that? Poor show old chap.