jdrocket wrote:
i am not saying saints didn't have the worst. but wire didn't have the best.
I think you'll find you did. Check the stats for amount of players used, Warrington used the least.
jdrocket wrote:
and
yeah that last game of the year where Wire fielded some of the reserves at quins while saints ahd to fight tooth and nail and
a few bent rules against cas. Wire could have probably nothed up a cricket score against quins.
That's not our fault you decided to rest a few. Maybe it's a lesson learnt as it backfired dramatically for you and we whooped you in round one.
jdrocket wrote:
oh and 2 fit half backs. if i wasn't poor i'd bet eastmond won't play 7 of the 27 rounds and Pryce wants to be Bradford ( and may well be) but you're right, they'll be tough.
2 props... i've heard perry is average [don't quote me on that though] and taking into account he will have to get used to St Helens (**shivers**) it may take a while.
But the year after it is bye bye Graham + Pryce, probabaly Eastmond, maybe Roby... the list goes on and on you know how many contracts end next year. I think it could be changing soon. But then again it isn't a hoodoo for nothing.
I love the blind hope Wire fans have each year.
I heard similar things when Sculthorpe left, when Long left, now that Cunningham has left. Saints are finished, bla bla bla. The fact is, when we lose our best players we replace them or produce someone from our academy with excellent ability and potential. Saints are a well managed club and whilst we aren't winning things right now, we're not far off and with a new coach and new stadium / training facility to come our side will only get stronger.
It's difficult to judge Simmons yet, and I could be wrong on this, but I've got a feeling he'll get an extra gear out of us that Potter couldn't manage, which could make a big difference. I'm hoping we'll get more luck on the injury front.