Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:21 am  

Ok I am forced to post this

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:30 am  

Sadfish wrote:

I'd rather have a spanking new stadium than a set of 3d plans.

I just wonder! what your vision is Sadfish of "spanking new stadium" ?? will it end up anything like the one and only illustration/drawing?? or will see a fleet of Ikea lorries arrive with a DIY stadium LOL

Even if Grunt is forced! to post pictures of soldiers?? it is only people asking questions and doing what a forum is a all about discussion!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:24 am  

Sadfish wrote:

I'd rather have a spanking new stadium than a set of 3d plans.

Ditto.

But I'd still like the club to follow through on its announcements. If it does so this time around then that will be great and will do me. But until it happens, scuse me if I remain skeptical.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:27 am  

jaybs wrote:

Even if Grunt is forced! to post pictures of soldiers?? it is only people asking questions and doing what a forum is a all about discussion!

Ask questions on a Saints forum? Think as an individual on a Saints forum? Nah! It just isn't done! Or it is, but the bleeting from the sheep is damn near deafening at the time!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:41 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

My point wasn't about the contractor, though. It was about the reliability of announcements from Saints. We fans never did get the opportunity to see the 3D plans, did we? I'll believe it when I hear/see it so far as the stadium is concerned!

Oh, and Billinge Lump, how do you know that Saddened! is joking? Some people cover their feelings with humour to fool others you know. It could be that Saddened! is really quite gloomy underneath.

Why do you care so deeply about the 3D plans or lack there of? 3D plans are good for looking at but loving useless to play rugby in!

You completely missed the point about the club keeping quiet after having their fingers burned with "speculation". This time the club have waited until its been made official before commenting, hopefully delays will be a minimum from here on in.

You obviously have little faith in the club (and the coach or even the team with most of your predictions). But please carry on thinking the worst, despite all your doom and gloom its turning into quite a good year so far, the future is certainly bright

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:53 am  

Chris Saint wrote:

You obviously have little faith in the club (and the coach or even the team with most of your predictions). But please carry on thinking the worst, despite all your doom and gloom its turning into quite a good year so far, the future is certainly bright

You obviously can't read.

I will spell it out for you, petal.

My point was about the club following through on its announcements. Since it did not do so on more than one occasion, not just the plans, I am skeptical that it will do so this time. Fingers burned goes both ways.

I would be very happy for Saints to follow through this time. My faith in their announcements will then be restored. It really isn't an issue but, as a sheep, if you wish to bleet about it, please don't let me stop you.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:01 am  

Why am i a sheep , when i drive past the stadium site every day and SEE things happening, have you not noticed the pictures on this thead (the reason for the thread by the way) , however if is makes you happy to call people shep when they disagree with your views then fine , it gets very boring when all we get in this thread are people saying "i wil beleive it when i see it" take a look at the site, they arent playing sandcastles they are preparign the site NOW.

Even if Grunt is forced! to post pictures of soldiers?? it is only people asking questions and doing what a forum is a all about discussion!

but people are not asking questions or discussing things they are being deliberately down beat and quite frankly not contributing anything to the thread , and jaybs the picture was a light hearted way of saying chill out with the negative waves man, but as a self confessed supporter of another team , Quinns if i recall what does it matter to you how our stadium is getting along?

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:11 am  

Gruntfuttock wrote:

have you not noticed the pictures on this thead (the reason for the thread by the way)

Indeed I have and that's great. But it's still not the stadium.

it gets very boring when all we get in this thread are people saying "i wil beleive it when i see it"

It may be boring but there have been a number of announcements made by the club that have not been followed through so it's not really surprising that people are skeptical when yet another announcement is promised, is it? I really don't see why you are so upset about people being skeptical in this context.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:27 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Indeed I have and that's great. But it's still not the stadium.

Lets just slap some sticks together in the middle of an unprepared bit of land and hope it all goes ok...

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:38 am  

Chris Saint wrote:

Why do you care so deeply about the 3D plans or lack there of? 3D plans are good for looking at but loving useless to play rugby in!

3D plans are a waste of money once planning has been approved plus with the architect no longer working on the project it would have been even more expensive to procure them.

Once the builder gets appointed I'm sure he'll get his architect to knock up some "artist's impressions" of what they are going to build for inclusion on publicity/advertising for selling season tickets for next season etc.