I don't get it, you ask a question, was burns worth the fee?
Were you expecting a different response, because the answer is simple, yes he was worth the fee.
He's not Tommy Martyn, but then who is???
He's a top notch competitor and has had some marvellous games for Saints. Please don't confuse the odd game on TV were you don't see him take on the line to equate with him being a player that was not worth putting some money out there to buy.
He's had his moments so far in the season, he's also had games were he has not had that touch of class, but classy or average he puts in 100% for the team. I'll take that any day. A player who puts in effort is never going to be put down at a club like Saints. Whether or not he is fast.
Players go through runs of form, at the moment Burns is on a bit of a average run of form. If he starts putting in those passes and cutting up teams in a few weeks, that's not going to make him a superstar, just because of a few good games. You have to see a player in the round and not just from game to game.
Was he worth the money. Damn Yes.