Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:20 am  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/29030926

Ban him for the rest of the season and any International games coming up?

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 4:48 pm  

Vespid_Wire wrote:

+1. Take a look at comments on the Super League Facebook page whenever Leeds are mentioned. Any criticism or debate is replied to with "hater", " you're jealous" and of course a picture of Sinfield with the Super League trophy.

It got old a while ago, now it's just embarrassing.

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:17 pm  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

What an absolute crock. Are you saying there shouldn't have been a cup final thread on any board other than Leeds and Cas? Fans of teams not involved in the Grand Final should have no thread about the match?

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:17 pm  

Does he protesteth too much? http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-league/news/article/480/9453349/hardaker-faces-fresh-allegations

Does he protesteth too much? http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-league/news/article/480/9453349/hardaker-faces-fresh-allegations

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:25 pm  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

It involves them as much as it involves you or me. It's a rugby league topic so they are free to discuss it.

The only person it directly involves is Hardaker and Flanaghan themselves.

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:48 pm  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

It will be fall-out from the eye gouging incident with Hill.

Re: hardaker : Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:02 pm  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

TBF to Warrington fans, the first Hardaker incident took place against Warrington yet they were threads on both the Saints and Wigan boards.

And to be even fairer as a Leeds fan, had the same incident/s happened with a Saints/Wire/Wigan player then it's around 95% certain they'd be a thread on the Leeds board about it.

Re: hardaker : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:24 am  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

Warrington starting a thread on something that doesn't involve them one bit is embarrassing.

It does involve us as he is dragging rugby league's name through the dirt. Second time in 3 months that our sport has made national news for homophobia because of him and only him.

I'm guessing this poor attempt at a comeback was because you know what I said was true and had no intelligent response?

Re: hardaker : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:50 am  

Oh, for the power of social media in the negative form, if we didn,t have facebook and twitter the Hardaker incident would have been forgotten within 24 hours.

Re: hardaker : Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:49 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Oh, for the power of social media in the negative form, if we didn,t have facebook and twitter the Hardaker incident would have been forgotten within 24 hours.

If Hardaker is guilty then would the incident being forgotten about be a good thing?