Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:11 pm  

From the video I've seen, which is presumably the same one that's going around, it seemed pretty obvious that McIlorum bit Wellens... Tetanus jabs will be needed.

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:29 pm  

There is no way that anyone can see a bite in that video. Talk about 2+ 2=5!

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm  

nohalfbacks wrote: There is no way that anyone can see a bite in that video. Talk about 2+ 2=5! I'd certainly saw it's worth the RFL looking into!

nohalfbacks wrote: There is no way that anyone can see a bite in that video. Talk about 2+ 2=5! I'd certainly saw it's worth the RFL looking into!

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:51 pm  

Thats very dangerous, mouth wide open biting into the wrist artery.

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:53 pm  

Freeze frames take it completely out of context as you have to look how the players got into that position.

Watching the clips on you tube I can eye how people come to the conclusion there was a bite. In reality the video doesn't prove anything except Wellens lead with the elbow into MM's face.

It he was bitten as Wellens seems to claim there will be a bite mark on his arm to show the ref which will be in his report and he will be charged. If he didn't here won't be any marks and he won't be charged. We will have to wait until Tuesday to find out.

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:06 pm  

Wellens use of a pastry arm guard was a dirty trick IMO

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:11 pm  

Eastbourne Warrior wrote:

Freeze frames take it completely out of context as you have to look how the players got into that position.

Funny how nobody was claiming this as they were posting screenshots of Danny Broughs "obvious" drop goal a few short weeks ago

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:21 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

Funny how nobody was claiming this as they were posting screenshots of Danny Broughs "obvious" drop goal a few short weeks ago

I was, I said I thought it missed then and I still do now.

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:29 pm  

Eastbourne Warrior wrote:

Freeze frames take it completely out of context as you have to look how the players got into that position.

Watching the clips on you tube I can eye how people come to the conclusion there was a bite. In reality the video doesn't prove anything except Wellens lead with the elbow into MM's face.

It he was bitten as Wellens seems to claim there will be a bite mark on his arm to show the ref which will be in his report and he will be charged. If he didn't here won't be any marks and he won't be charged. We will have to wait until Tuesday to find out.

The freeze frame clearly shows not just Wellens' arm in McIlorum's mouth, but a clear tension of the muscles in McIlorum's face, making it fairly obvious that he was 'biting down'. What more context do you need? For all of the Wigan fans' post on this board about how Saints fans are blind/biased/blinkered/deluded, you guys really do seem to have trouble accepting this incident.

Re: wello bitten?. : Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:31 pm  

I can't understand why Wellens would say it if was not true. It's a serious allegation.