Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:42 am  

Indeed. I am not starting a 'Wilkin Out' campaign, I just think the money could have been used elsewhere, to better effect.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:01 pm  

I would have thought Tony Puletua would be used as more of a front rower next year????

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:08 pm  

It's worth taking in to consideration that Dixon wouldn't just have been judged against those already in the first team, but also against the current academy crop. It may well be that the club expect someone like Andre Savelio to break into the first team squad soon, in which case the argument for keeping hold of a 22 year old fringe player becomes significantly weaker.

One of the side effects of having a good youth system is that you will end up having to let go of players who will go on to carve out decent Super League careers at other clubs. If we dump Gaskell I will be upset, but this seems like a reasonable call to me.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:13 pm  

Dux wrote:

but this seems like a reasonable call to me.

I cant see why anybody would see this as a reasonable call!!! Letting go of Dixon who was showing signs of improvment at the start of the season and signing an over the hill 32 year old replacement??? Bad business if you ask me!

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:15 pm  

on_the_charge wrote:

I cant see why anybody would see this as a reasonable call!!! Letting go of Dixon who was showing signs of improvment at the start of the season and signing an over the hill 32 year old replacement??? Bad business if you ask me!

Willie Manu is a replacement for Flannery. Dixon will, in all likelihood, be replaced from within by another young player.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:21 pm  

on_the_charge wrote:

I cant see why anybody would see this as a reasonable call!!! Letting go of Dixon who was showing signs of improvment at the start of the season and signing an over the hill 32 year old replacement??? Bad business if you ask me!

Define "over the hill"?

A Dixon "showing improvement" vs Manu, on the evidence of the form he has CONSISTENTLY shown during his time in SL, is an absolute no-brainer.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:27 pm  

I rate Dixon, and I'd liked him to have stayed as a squad player / back up option.

Maybe he wanted more than this (and if he didn't, he should if he has any ambition at all), maybe our cap doesn't stretch to the luxury of keeping him and his wage demands for a back up player.

Either way, he has signed for Salford. We're not talking a player in demand by any of the major players in SL. The argument that we should have kept him rather than sign the ever-impressive Manu puzzles me.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:35 pm  

on_the_charge wrote:

I cant see why anybody would see this as a reasonable call!!! Letting go of Dixon who was showing signs of improvment at the start of the season and signing an over the hill 32 year old replacement??? Bad business if you ask me!

Manu is 10 times the player Dixon is or ever will be. If we ever need another Dixon we can pull one out of the academy any time. Get a bloody clue for once in your life.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:54 pm  

So your quite happy for us to go down the Wigan road and sign overrated over the hill players like they did in 2005/06 and continue to langish in 4th or 5th and have a battle with relegation in that time???? Sorry I would like to see our young crop of players be given a long run in the side to cement a first team place. Dixon was showing real signs of improvement at the start of the year and looked liked becoming a strong backrower. Ok he has his faults but under a strong coaching team he could have improved further and become a strong backrower.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:01 pm  

on_the_charge wrote:

So your quite happy for us to go down the Wigan road and sign overrated over the hill players like they did in 2005/06 and continue to langish in 4th or 5th and have a battle with relegation in that time???? Sorry I would like to see our young crop of players be given a long run in the side to cement a first team place. Dixon was showing real signs of improvement at the start of the year and looked liked becoming a strong backrower. Ok he has his faults but under a strong coaching team he could have improved further and become a strong backrower.

I'm quite happy for us to go down the "build the best possible team" route, yes.