Re: Lee Gaskell : Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:39 pm  

Cragganmore Kid wrote:

He's injured.

He played the full game against Wigan and was walking around with everyone at the end no problem.

Not injured. Just not picked.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:02 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

He played the full game against Wigan and was walking around with everyone at the end no problem.

Not injured. Just not picked.

He could have been injured doing anything it might not be rugby related. If he has been dropped however given our current injuries my prediction of him not having a future at Saints looks right.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:14 pm  

Is he out of favour?

Always thought he and Lomax were your most promising youngsters.

Re: Lee Gaskell : Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:26 pm  

Gaskell if not injuried should feel unlucky not to be picked now lomax and wilkin are out

Re: Lee Gaskell : Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:11 pm  

Maybe Gaskell and the coaching staff have concluded that, at this time, he'll be better served learning more of his craft and rebuilding his confidence in the 'reserve' team. Don't forget that Rush has been his mentor at Saints and knows him as a player better than anyone (and, one would assume, Gaskell has trust in Rush)

Re: Lee Gaskell : Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:26 pm  

Webbo wrote:

Maybe Gaskell and the coaching staff have concluded that, at this time, he'll be better served learning more of his craft and rebuilding his confidence in the 'reserve' team. Don't forget that Rush has been his mentor at Saints and knows him as a player better than anyone (and, one would assume, Gaskell has trust in Rush)