Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:19 am  

Back to Hock, there's an unbelievable stat (pointed out by Wigan fans) that is currently doing the rounds on Twitter. Since 2008 he has played 110 games and been banned for 102 (69 for the substance abuse ban, 33 for on-field incidents).

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 9:49 am  

Don't forget big Tony P. He had great off load game.

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:51 am  

St pete wrote:

Don't forget big Tony P. He had great off load game.

I remember he threw one around the back of his head as he went down, hit the man perfectly. Great Player.

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:07 am  

Ali Lauitiiti is another who back in his day was a fantastic ball player.

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:25 pm  

So it's agreed Hock is not a ball playing forward, but a great offloader. However there are others around and have been around who did not bring the baggage of Hock.

Put it this way, would you take Hock today or Manu??

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:38 pm  

Willie Manu is twice as fit as Hock despite being five or so years older.

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:48 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Willie Manu is twice as fit as Hock despite being five or so years older.

Hock never gets the chance to be match fit due to his self infliction.

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:17 pm  

LFC Saint wrote: Pond life. We should bring Keith Mason out of retirement for our return fixture at Langtree (for people that dont know Keith as threatened Hock quite a number of times on twitter and Hock Sh*tes himself). There's only one who does the running. http://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/news/ ... -1-7111803

LFC Saint wrote: Pond life. We should bring Keith Mason out of retirement for our return fixture at Langtree (for people that dont know Keith as threatened Hock quite a number of times on twitter and Hock Sh*tes himself). There's only one who does the running. http://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/news/ ... -1-7111803

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:37 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote: There's only one who does the running. http://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/news/ ... -1-7111803 How is that relevant?

Rogues Gallery wrote: There's only one who does the running. http://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/news/ ... -1-7111803 How is that relevant?

Re: Hock : Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:20 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

How is that relevant?

Very much like the poster .. it isnt. Shame he's not banned here too