Ande wrote:
Lomax is not a full back.
How many jeffing times! What a waste of talent it would be sticking him back there.
I agree with some other posters on this, I'm really not sure where you're coming from.
Lomax is a very good talent, but I'm not convinced he has the passing, organising or kicking game to be a top half back. He seems to be more of an elusive runner with a good step and a decent passing game. He's got safe hands and played alot of reserve rugby at full back, so I believe that is his best position.
I also disagree that it'd be a waste putting him back there as the full back spot is so pivotal particularly offensively.