Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:15 pm  

St pete wrote:

His Replacement has been brought in and the fact roby is a 80 min player Moore is playing backrow.

The squad is shrinking by the day?

We've brought in laffranchi, hohaia and Flanagan and we've lost pryce, Graham, eastmond so far that's been confirmed.

To be honest I didn't phrase it very well. I should have said the quality in the Saints squad is shrinking by the day.

St pete wrote:

Wigan have lost Hoffman and coley and signed who?

Well we've played all be it one game without Fielden this year, so a fully fit Fielden will be Andy's replacement.

Hoffman will be a loss as he's been nothing short of superb. However Hock's now back and showing real improvement week after week. So hopefully he can regain his title as the best backrower in SL once again.

Granted we haven't announced the signing of anyone as of yet, though it does appear that Lenegan doesn't like to announce anything until the season is done and dusted. But we are rumored to be signing Gil Dudson from the Crusaders and activly lucking for centre to allow Joel to return the pack. But to be honest we've got a big squad as it is, so one or two signings are all us Wigan fans expect. It'll be the introduction of some more fantastic juniors next year that I'll be looking forward to!

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:18 pm  

Don't derail the thread spooge or you'll be banned

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:21 pm  

what do you know Pete?
is he staying or going?

big loss if we do lose him.

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:22 pm  

St pete wrote:

Don't derail the thread spooge or you'll be banned

Can Wigan fans be banned on RLFans? I think were immune aren't we?

The tolerance of this Saints board is evident everytime Rogues posts on it. He must have some dirt on somebody surely?

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:25 pm  

LovesToSpooge wrote:

Can Wigan fans be banned on RLFans? I think were immune aren't we?

The tolerance of this Saints board is evident everytime Rogues posts on it. He must have some dirt on somebody surely?

Or maybe we have a sense of humour unlike your board

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:38 pm  

If the Moore to Salford rumour is true, we've got be sending Matty Smith back in your direction?

Having signed McPhersen, South Sydney, and, possibly Ashurst and Moon from you guys and NZ Warriors, we don't really need moore (couldn't resist) backrow forwards. So we must be signing him as a hooker, which has been Smith's main position of late. Moore does have a much better defence Smith.

Infact, Smith is an absolute liability in defence most games.

Whilst I'm here, can we take LMS/Puletua off you? Either would be top quality signings, not that I mean to point out the obvious.

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:49 pm  

LincolnDEVILSFan wrote:

So we must be signing him as a hooker, which has been Smith's main position of late. Moore does have a much better defence Smith.

Moore hasn't really played at hooker this season. He's been much more effective in the second row. He's a bit inconsistent but he definitely puts in the hits. Aggressive and works very hard every match. Can have brainfarts but can also be superb. Rough with the smooth I guess.

Whilst I'm here, can we take LMS/Puletua off you?

Nope. Both are signed up and ours for the next two seasons, so clear off!

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:58 pm  

St pete wrote:

You've got a pm

Pm for me too please

Re: Scott Moore : Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:24 pm  

LincolnDEVILSFan wrote:

If the Moore to Salford rumour is true, we've got be sending Matty Smith back in your direction?

Having signed McPhersen, South Sydney, and, possibly Ashurst and Moon from you guys and NZ Warriors, we don't really need moore (couldn't resist) backrow forwards. So we must be signing him as a hooker, which has been Smith's main position of late. Moore does have a much better defence Smith.

Infact, Smith is an absolute liability in defence most games.

Whilst I'm here, can we take LMS/Puletua off you? Either would be top quality signings, not that I mean to point out the obvious.

I wouldn't sign Moore if it's a hooker you're after. His distribution is almost Highamesque. Cracking bit of biff from the second row, though, and I'll be sorry to see him move on.

If Smith is returning, well words fail me...

Re: Scott Moore : Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:51 am  

Moore is definitely off at the end of the season, I have no idea on the terms though.