Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 9:58 am  

Carlotti wrote:

Rogues is spot on about the whiting decision and as regards Yeaman,I think you mean Briscoe,but if you look at that again in slow motion you will find that when he catches the ball his foot is just inside the dead ball line,watch it again.

I may. I'll stand by my 2nd point though.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 10:00 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

OM, so you agree Whitings feet WERE on the line when he caught the ball?

I'd have to watch it back, but I'm sure you wouldn't lie to me.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 10:26 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

OM, so you agree Whitings feet WERE on the line when he caught the ball?

you spend so much time on our forum trying to get your little wigan bias under our radar with your futile gibes . why not start a campaign on the goon site
entitled " Shouldnt the worlds undisputed greatest club have a ground of our own" we could all do with the rest from your rantings

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 10:48 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

OM, so you agree Whitings feet WERE on the line when he caught the ball?

Quick rule check: Assuming they were, does the fact that the ball had bounced in field rather than being on the full affect the outcome decision?

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 11:22 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Quick rule check: Assuming they were, does the fact that the ball had bounced in field rather than being on the full affect the outcome decision?

I don't think so. Think of it this way had Whiting stood completely outside the field of play and picked the ball up it would have been head and feed to Hull.

It was just a bad error from the touchjudge / referee and a costly one for Hull.

On the bias. Clarke, Wells, Carney, McDermott and O'Connor all thought that the last penalty was the wrong decision.

Are they ALL biased against Saints?

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 11:27 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I'd have to watch it back, but I'm sure you wouldn't lie to me.

Oh yes he would. He can't bear the fact that we are STILL above Wigan in the league table.

I've watched that match twice. And it is quite clear that Whiting gets the ball then one foot goes on the touchline followed quickly by the other. The touchie put up his flag and the correct decision was made. It was quite clear to everyone with eyesight and a TV screen, except Rogues. Who probably needs to go to Specsavers. But it's ok, because he's old enough for a free prescription.

However, we are still owed a set of six.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 11:35 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

I don't think so. Think of it this way had Whiting stood completely outside the field of play and picked the ball up it would have been head and feed to Hull.

I realise that, there's just something that doesn't seem to flow right with that situaion for me.

It was just a bad error from the touchjudge / referee and a costly one for Hull.

On the bias. Clarke, Wells, Carney, McDermott and O'Connor all thought that the last penalty was the wrong decision.

Are they ALL biased against Saints?

Prob not, but despite all the hoo-harr, its not a 100% cut and dry desicion.
We've been on the end of plenty of dubious refs calls, as well as getting some our way. Its just part of the game. As clarky said, that just gets the headlines because it was right at the end.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 11:42 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

Oh yes he would. He can't bear the fact that we are STILL above Wigan in the league table.

I've watched that match twice. And it is quite clear that Whiting gets the ball then one foot goes on the touchline followed quickly by the other. The touchie put up his flag and the correct decision was made. It was quite clear to everyone with eyesight and a TV screen, except Rogues. Who probably needs to go to Specsavers. But it's ok, because he's old enough for a free prescription.

However, we are still owed a set of six.

You need to change your tv or specs. The ball is still at head height and Whitings left foot is on the line (the front part is actually over) By the time he catches it both feet are on the line.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 11:48 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

You need to change your tv or specs. The ball is still at head height and Whitings left foot is on the line (the front part is actually over) By the time he catches it both feet are on the line.

Bye Rogues.

Re: Unacceptable bias : Tue May 03, 2011 12:24 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

I don't think so. Think of it this way had Whiting stood completely outside the field of play and picked the ball up it would have been head and feed to Hull.

It was just a bad error from the touchjudge / referee and a costly one for Hull.

It was the correct decision IMO.

O

Rogues Gallery wrote:

n the bias. Clarke, Wells, Carney, McDermott and O'Connor all thought that the last penalty was the wrong decision.

I was definatley the wrong decision, no two ways about it.