: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:05 am  

i think its very hard to pick between the two, on ability i couldn't pick, but i'd take graham as he's younger

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:10 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

i think its very hard to pick between the two, on ability i couldn't pick, but i'd take graham as he's younger

Agreed James Graham Is A Huge Prospect But At This Moment In Time Personally It Would Be Jamie Peacock For Me Based On What He Has Achieved In The Game...

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:10 am  

back on topic (sorry) would fans prefer KC on a new two year deal, knowing he would be around 34 at the end of it, or Scott Moore on 5 year, much cheaper contract? I can't decide. KC is clearly better, but for how long? With moores contract up this year we may have to decide this year.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:26 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

Exactly...
Stupid Argument Not Worth Getting Into...
Jamie Peacock Is World Renowned Across Rugby League, Where As James Graham Hasn't Got That Exposure Yet...

Wasnt trying in start an argument just offering my personal opinion!

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:48 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

Exactly...
Stupid Argument Not Worth Getting Into...
Jamie Peacock Is World Renowned Across Rugby League, Where As James Graham Hasn't Got That Exposure Yet...

Strange that as last year James Graham was voted the worlds best prop, defeating likes of Petero Civonicieva & Steve Price. So clearly he has a great reputation already down under.

This was at the RL international federation awards.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:25 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

back on topic (sorry) would fans prefer KC on a new two year deal, knowing he would be around 34 at the end of it, or Scott Moore on 5 year, much cheaper contract? I can't decide. KC is clearly better, but for how long? With moores contract up this year we may have to decide this year.

Assuming Moore would want to return to Saints, of course. He may have found his natural home at Udders.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

back on topic (sorry) would fans prefer KC on a new two year deal, knowing he would be around 34 at the end of it, or Scott Moore on 5 year, much cheaper contract? I can't decide. KC is clearly better, but for how long? With moores contract up this year we may have to decide this year.

I think KC is going to make that decision. He isn't going to play on like some do, he'll retire early.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:06 pm  

The Chair Maker wrote:

Strange that as last year James Graham was voted the worlds best prop, defeating likes of Petero Civonicieva & Steve Price. So clearly he has a great reputation already down under.

This was at the RL international federation awards.

I was thinking the same thing. If Graham was on the market now he would have alot of ARL clubs very interested in him.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:08 pm  

The Chair Maker wrote:

Strange that as last year James Graham was voted the worlds best prop, defeating likes of Petero Civonicieva & Steve Price. So clearly he has a great reputation already down under.

This was at the RL international federation awards.

Let's See How He Progresses Before Comparing Him To A World Class Player Such As Jamie Peacock...
Also Let's See If James Graham Actually Does Go Down Under At Any Time In His Career And Possibly Tries Out The NRL...

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:13 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

Let's See How He Progresses Before Comparing Him To A World Class Player Such As Jamie Peacock...
Also Let's See If James Graham Actually Does Go Down Under At Any Time In His Career And Possibly Tries Out The NRL...

So he as to go to the NRL to show his a world class player ? Bollox.

Ye lets make the NRL stronger while making super league weaker. Great shout!

Gareth Ellis is living proof that OUR plyers can hold their own in the NRL.