Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:26 pm  

Mr_C wrote:

He should have called him a coward, thats what Flanagans act was

Yes but he called him a effing puff. He's got gays on the brain while he plays

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:50 pm  

St pete wrote:

Yes but he called him a effing puff. He's got gays on the brain while he plays

You sure now as it was a "possibility" a few minutes ago? Make your mind up as the Nation awaits your verdict with baited breath! No, really!

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:55 pm  

ryano wrote:

You sure now as it was a "possibility" a few minutes ago? Make your mind up as the Nation awaits your verdict with baited breath! No, really!

IMO he's said it but I can't be 100% sure but I stand by what I seen with my own eyes.

It's strange that in a game he has gay men on his mind. Maybe he should concentrate more in the game than gay men.

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:19 pm  

St pete wrote:

IMO he's said it but I can't be 100% sure but I stand by what I seen with my own eyes.

It's strange that in a game he has gay men on his mind. Maybe he should concentrate more in the game than gay men.

You repeated this on this thread and also on the Leeds thread.

You seem desperately hopeful that Zak could be interested in men.

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:55 pm  

BackrowSaint wrote:

Tackling him?

Something happened in that tackle. You can't see anything from the camera angle on TV. Hardaker reacted to it imidiatly followed up by the kiss blowing and use of inappropriate language. I speculated whether there was a cheeky 'squirrel grip' which would explain the kiss and the words allegedly used, other on the VT thought he may have twisted Hardakers an clue or knee. As I said though it was obvious something happened impossible to tell what.

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:09 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

You repeated this on this thread and also on the Leeds thread.

You seem desperately hopeful that Zak could be interested in men.

That's what the threads are for mate. To discuss rugby league topics. That's why I posted in both threads. Is this against the AUP?

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 4:54 pm  

St pete wrote:

That's what the threads are for mate. To discuss rugby league topics. That's why I posted in both threads. Is this against the AUP?

Nope and I clearly didn't say or suggest it was anything close to being against the AUP......just pointing out that you seem so keen to hope Hardaker thinks of men in a homosexual way on a rugby pitch that you've become quite repetitive in saying it. Maybe it's what's clouding your opinion on this subject.

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:04 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Nope and I clearly didn't say or suggest it was anything close to being against the AUP......just pointing out that you seem so keen to hope Hardaker thinks of men in a homosexual way on a rugby pitch that you've become quite repetitive in saying it. Maybe it's what's clouding your opinion on this subject.

I've said it twice

Maybe you'd line to think that

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:37 pm  

Pete's already declared his man crush is for Burns alone.

Hardaker will just have to miss out, or wait for someone else.

Re: hardaker : Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:51 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Pete's already declared his man crush is for Burns alone.

Hardaker will just have to miss out, or wait for someone else.

True. Burns has my heart













Oh and saintsfan