Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:08 am  

St pete wrote:

The will be better quality players than Samutt coming in I can be sure of that. I'd say Defo another one coming in but maybe another as well.

Won't be announced just yet.....

I've also heard something similar this morning that one is now a done deal but won't be announced just yet...I assume this is the same player you are talking about

Great addition if true and will really give us something we have lacked for a while IMO...imagine most people (apart from saddened obviously ) will be happy with it

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 12:59 pm  

I remember seeing Sammut at Knowsley Road and he was quick and elusive back then.

After seeing him over here regularly you'd need a very good defensive system as I think he may be found wanting on occasions.

Not sure he's worth a gamble.

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:37 pm  

St pete wrote:

They pretty sure they have bagged one of them.

Give us the positions they play

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:51 pm  

St pete wrote:

They pretty sure they have bagged one of them.

This can't be true as McManus isn't bothered about the squad and does nothing. Everyone knows that.

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:10 pm  

Fatbelly wrote:

This is a good point. If Super League were to be 1st past the post then the League table would be different.
It would be a top 3 of Wigan, Warrington & Cas, in what order I'm not sure.

Wire busy proving they are unbeatable against teams outside your named three when it matter. . . .

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:08 pm  

I can live with that result

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:57 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

This can't be true as McManus isn't bothered about the squad and does nothing. Everyone knows that.

Nah that's not true, he's put the best pack in super league together

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 8:07 pm  

St pete wrote:

They pretty sure they have bagged one of them.

According to one of our biggest but not accurate blaggers its Burns.

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 9:36 pm  

If it's burns Pete will be making a mess of himself.

Re: jarrod samutt : Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:23 pm  

blakeysrobin wrote:

According to one of our biggest but not accurate blaggers its Burns.

I thought burns rumour had been quashed? And I'd struggle to see McManus' position in the wider arguments surrounding rugby league at the moment strengthened by paying a transfer fee for a 30 year old import - as good as he may be...

Interesting times ahead though if McManus is turning to the chequebook ...