Re: More unwelcome news ... : Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:32 pm  

meatpaste wrote:

It was not clumsy,as you keep saying, I was a vicious pre meditated high tackle and replays did not make it look worse than it was. Meli has broken his arm because of the force used.

It was clumsy. Your description is a joke and shows you dont have a clue of the meaning of the words you actually type. The alternative is your trolling.

I once broke my arm tacking someone legally so that getting injured proves nothing.

There arnt many 'vicious' or 'pre meditated' challenges these days although I have seen a few , most of them were commited by the late Terry Newton and I remember a couple by our very own Sonny Nickle.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:15 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

It was clumsy. Your description is a joke and shows you dont have a clue of the meaning of the words you actually type. The alternative is your trolling.

I once broke my arm tacking someone legally so that getting injured proves nothing.

There arnt many 'vicious' or 'pre meditated' challenges these days although I have seen a few , most of them were commited by the late Terry Newton and I remember a couple by our very own Sonny Nickle.

Your description as "clumsy" is the joke. This is how most people saw it including the Rfl Disciplinary panel,and explains why Meli escaped a longer ban.

Rule: 15.1(b) Detail: High Tackle – Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent Grade E

The committee are no doubt this was a serious act of misconduct and had the potential for serious injury which thankfully did not occur. The committee give the player credit for admitting guilt to a very reckless tackle. The player does have an excellent disciplinary record over a 15 year first grade career in Super League and the NRL and feel that a 4 match suspension and a £300 is appropriate in this in instance.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:51 pm  

Red & White wrote:

Your description as "clumsy" is the joke. This is how most people saw it including the Rfl Disciplinary panel,and explains why Meli escaped a longer ban.

Rule: 15.1(b) Detail: High Tackle – Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent Grade E

The committee are no doubt this was a serious act of misconduct and had the potential for serious injury which thankfully did not occur. The committee give the player credit for admitting guilt to a very reckless tackle. The player does have an excellent disciplinary record over a 15 year first grade career in Super League and the NRL and feel that a 4 match suspension and a £300 is appropriate in this in instance.

The above highlighted statements will tell you that it was not deliberate (Word not used at all in RFL report) and Meli is not, in any way, that type of player.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:46 pm  

Red & White wrote: Your description as "clumsy" is the joke. This is how most people saw it including the Rfl Disciplinary panel,and explains why Meli escaped a longer ban. Rule: 15.1(b) Detail: High Tackle – Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent Grade E The committee are no doubt this was a serious act of misconduct and had the potential for serious injury which thankfully did not occur. The committee give the player credit for admitting guilt to a very reckless tackle. The player does have an excellent disciplinary record over a 15 year first grade career in Super League and the NRL and feel that a 4 match suspension and a £300 is appropriate in this in instance. Keep bleating but non of your moaning will make it anything but a clumsy tackle, reckless but not dirty, not intentional and certainly not pre meditated like that previous pillock suggested . He got 4 games and deserved it for being an oaf. This Video is Hosted on Youtube : Users should see the AUP for allowable uses

Red & White wrote: Your description as "clumsy" is the joke. This is how most people saw it including the Rfl Disciplinary panel,and explains why Meli escaped a longer ban. Rule: 15.1(b) Detail: High Tackle – Intentional – stiff arm tackle – no attempt to tackle legitimately – violent Grade E The committee are no doubt this was a serious act of misconduct and had the potential for serious injury which thankfully did not occur. The committee give the player credit for admitting guilt to a very reckless tackle. The player does have an excellent disciplinary record over a 15 year first grade career in Super League and the NRL and feel that a 4 match suspension and a £300 is appropriate in this in instance. Keep bleating but non of your moaning will make it anything but a clumsy tackle, reckless but not dirty, not intentional and certainly not pre meditated like that previous pillock suggested . He got 4 games and deserved it for being an oaf. This Video is Hosted on Youtube : Users should see the AUP for allowable uses

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:49 pm  

Top Saint wrote:

The above highlighted statements will tell you that it was not deliberate (Word not used at all in RFL report) and Meli is not, in any way, that type of player.

I'd love to hear one of those idiots at the RFL explain how smashing someones jaw to bits like Chase did is worth 3 but a clumsy high tackle where the player is fine is worth 4 . That would be some explanation.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:22 am  

No1 Saint wrote:

I'd love to hear one of those idiots at the RFL explain how smashing someones jaw to bits like Chase did is worth 3 but a clumsy high tackle where the player is fine is worth 4 . That would be some explanation.

They were clumsy with the pen and put a tick in the wrong box.... Go over the other side of the hill where there have been complaints about inconsistency for years.

And... it wasn't clumsy. You seem to be the lone voice in the crowd beating that particular drum.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:35 am  

goobervision wrote:

They were clumsy with the pen and put a tick in the wrong box.... Go over the other side of the hill where there have been complaints about inconsistency for years.

And... it wasn't clumsy. You seem to be the lone voice in the crowd beating that particular drum.

Beg to differ , a glance at this thread would suggest otherwise

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:18 pm  

I have seen every London home game this season, and you could select the players wives and still overpower the London forwards. You'll need to watch Dixon, though, he's on fire at the moment

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:55 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Beg to differ , a glance at this thread would suggest otherwise

Oh sorry, Albion mentions clumsy back on page 3 and you continue repeatedly from there in the thread which has nothing to do with Meligate. Whilst many on this board, others and the RFL are genrally not in the clumsy camp.

Re: More unwelcome news ... : Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:57 pm  

goobervision wrote:

Oh sorry, Albion mentions clumsy back on page 3 and you continue repeatedly from there in the thread which has nothing to do with Meligate. Whilst many on this board, others and the RFL are genrally not in the clumsy camp.

Keep repeating yourself will not make it come true.