Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:03 pm  

carmont is king wrote:

Read it.......

Understood it......

I'm right......

You're not.......

Ohhh dear.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:07 pm  

Cragganmore Kid wrote:

Ohhh dear.

The clue is in the username bro.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:16 pm  

carmont is king wrote:

Well well....there's a shock, stains fans thinking they were the best team in a game they were absolutely battered in, wonders will never cease.

if you can't grasp the simple concept that he's saying most saints fans (including himself) agree wigan deserved their win then you dont deserve to be able to post. Do you get it yet?

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:19 pm  

I agree with the original point of the thread. Two out of three has been a very good effort. Losing to Wigan without our main playmaker for most of the game is nothing to be ashamed of. Given what we all feared when we lost to two shocking teams in Hull and Bradford what would happen when we played the 3 big clubs.

The team has played very well over the last few weeks given what happened before

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:50 pm  

2 out of 3 has been a great turnaround. The season and the real hard work starts now however - we need to win another 10 league games and then find a gameplan that'll bring wins in the playoffs. The last 3 games have shown that we are more than capable of doing that but there's a long way to go yet.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:03 pm  

Noel Cleal wrote:

Given what we all feared when we lost to two shocking teams in Hull and Bradford

This would be Hull who are presently second in the league and Bradford who just beat Leeds? And remember, we haven't won at Bradford since 2007.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:45 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

This would be Hull who are presently second in the league and Bradford who just beat Leeds? And remember, we haven't won at Bradford since 2007.

Yep it was all fine under Royce the new team have changed nothing we did not really beat Leeds or Wire and only the last loss counts and taken as a stand alone it justifies my point of view.

I was no hater of Royce but I'm fast becoming one the more of this I hear. I've been tempted on a few occasions to risk Liable and probably a permanent ban to post some things on here, but thankfully sense has prevailed.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:47 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

I've been tempted on a few occasions to risk Liable and probably a permanent ban to post some things on here, but thankfully sense has prevailed.

It's libel btw.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:22 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

:lol:

It's libel btw.

There she goes again. Post about RUGBY or POST OFF Elsewhere.

Re: 2 out of 3 ain't bad. : Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:47 pm  

Top Saint wrote:

There she goes again. Post about RUGBY or POST OFF Elsewhere.

I think you should take your own advice.