Re: Saints financial woes : Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:19 pm
Rogues Gallery wrote:
Much better news at Wigan.
Accounts for the last financial year (ending Nov 2010 - i.e. the 2010 season) has recently been filed by the club with Companies House.
Main highlights:
- Operating profit of £141k against an operating loss of £459k from 2009
- Turnover up 15% to £5.5m against £4.8m the previous year
- Stadium rental costs of £197k against £190k the previous year. Notes to the accounts confirm that "rates determined by match revenues" and we have a "25 year renewable lease"
- The £2m loan that was assumed to be owed to Whelan was paid on 3 December.
- Net debt position reduced from £1.63m to £1.29m
Overall some very encouraging results and will probably only get better this year.
Accounts for the last financial year (ending Nov 2010 - i.e. the 2010 season) has recently been filed by the club with Companies House.
Main highlights:
- Operating profit of £141k against an operating loss of £459k from 2009
- Turnover up 15% to £5.5m against £4.8m the previous year
- Stadium rental costs of £197k against £190k the previous year. Notes to the accounts confirm that "rates determined by match revenues" and we have a "25 year renewable lease"
- The £2m loan that was assumed to be owed to Whelan was paid on 3 December.
- Net debt position reduced from £1.63m to £1.29m
Overall some very encouraging results and will probably only get better this year.
Well done indeed Rougues. Quite how the club managed to increase revenues by 14% but actually reduce overall costs but increasing salaries is quite a feat, however some of it is down to transfer fees being over £225,000 less than in 2009
What you don't say is:
- Club is still insolvent to the tune of £2.69M in spite of the £572,000 benefit of a 2010 property revaluation.
There is no clue how the £2M loan was repaid e.g. another loan from the parent co LENAGAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED or Barclays bank loan. In other words what is likely in the absence of a share issue is that one debt been replaced by another.
The parent company to which Wigan owed £1.08M is a non trading insolvent company supported by its shareholders (Simon and Ann Lenagan).
Large liabilities for deferred income and accrued expenses amount to over £1.5M well up from previous years.
The club is still under investigation by the Inland Revenue (HMRC) for PAYE/NI issues arising out of payments including expenses to employees. No agreement has been reached with HMRC.
(Hypothetically, if at some stage HMRC sucessfully argue and rule that some expenses payments are in fact to be treated as salary then this may possibly have SC implications for the club and possibly other clubs (having said that, there is no such note about HMRC in Saints 2010 accounts) - of course no-one including myself is accusing Wigan or anyone connected to them of any sort of wrongdoing). This is also a big issue in RU
In the end, Wigan's accounts are not much better than those of Saints apart from the fact that for the first time in a very long time Wigan has made a small - but nonetheless positive - profit after tax of £38K.
Against that, we will own a new shiney stadium. I know which I'd rather have?