Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:57 am  

Taken from BBC Sport

"can cover at hooker if need be"

End of Moore at Saints?

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:59 am  

Mr. Messy wrote:

Taken from BBC Sport

"can cover at hooker if need be"

End of Moore at Saints?

That may be decided next week.

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:59 am  

Mr. Messy wrote:

Taken from BBC Sport

"can cover at hooker if need be"

End of Moore at Saints?

Well, it IS July!

Not necessarily. But perhaps the end of Moore as a potential replacement hooker.

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:03 pm  

You can now name a starting 17 for Saints that does not even have Flannery and Wellens in it. That for me indicates we have more depth next year in terms of replacements, but I do concure we look a prop short. But maybe we just can't get our hands on one.

ie would people have prefered Hill over Flannaghan.

Is a 2nd rower NRL player better than a championship prop?

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:05 pm  

Moore could easily play as Royce's utility back, whilst also covering every forward position apart from prop.

Not a bad utility guy to have, better than sticking an under 21 winger on the bench only to have 5 mins at the end of a match.

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:11 pm  

Flanagan looks to be on the bench this week, so that is good news. He needs the game time.

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:16 pm  

good signing saints wish we would of got him but youve got a gud un there

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:51 pm  

Good signing but I can't help echo the comments that it isn't what the squad particularly needs. Could turn out to be a very good move though, we'll just have to see.

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:54 pm  

Maybe a Chris Joynt esq type signing?

Re: Flanagan Confirmed : Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:55 pm  

The Chief wrote:

Maybe a Chris Joynt esq type signing?

No pressure on the lad then