Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:21 am  

He wont stay at Saints although he wont go to union.

hes burnt his bridges with the senior players.

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:33 am  

MacBlondie wrote:

He wont stay at Saints although he wont go to union.

hes burnt his bridges with the senior players.

I'm not sure that is a major problem, given that we've only got about 4 senior players.

Where do you get this rubbish? Everyone on here claims to be an insider and know the ins and outs of the goings on at the club. But then none of them ever have a clue about anything that does become reality.

So do tell me, with Warrington, Wigan, Leeds and Huddersfield all spending up to the cap, where is Ickle Kyle off to?

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:59 am  

Saddened! wrote:

Where do you get this rubbish?

Whilst claiming to be a Sts supporter, MacBlondie has recently posted that he'd swap Graham for Fielden in an heartbeat and that S Tomkins is way ahead of Kyle Eastmond. Now there's this.

Seems to me he just likes winding people up.

Don't we have a word for that sort of thing?

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:19 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Whilst claiming to be a Sts supporter, MacBlondie has recently posted that he'd swap Graham for Fielden in an heartbeat and that S Tomkins is way ahead of Kyle Eastmond. Now there's this.

Seems to me he just likes winding people up.

Don't we have a word for that sort of thing?

Saddened?

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:28 am  

Billinge_Lump wrote:

Saddened?

Coffee....All over my keyboard. PMSL

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:38 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Whilst claiming to be a Sts supporter, MacBlondie has recently posted that he'd swap Graham for Fielden in an heartbeat and that S Tomkins is way ahead of Kyle Eastmond. Now there's this.

Seems to me he just likes winding people up.

Don't we have a word for that sort of thing?

Not that I have to explain myself to some random, but Tomkins IS way ahead of Eastmond, only a one eyed Saints fan would think otherwise. People forget that even when Eastmond was fit, he was still anonymous for 3/4 of the game, popping up with an important try or break and then the mass ejaculation commenced. Tomkins has for more to his game and considering we only have the ginger whinger for one more season, yes, id have Fielden in a heartbeat given the comparative form of the 2.

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:48 am  

MacBlondie wrote:

considering we only have the ginger whinger for one more season, yes, id have Fielden in a heartbeat given the comparative form of the 2.

Ludicrous statement which you'll see when Fielden gets thrown around like a rag doll again in Australia. Some of your statements recently have been fairly considered and constructive, however the one above about Graham and Fielden is hopelessly wide of the mark. You may wish to get into a discussion about that but I can tell you now there is no discussion. A few quick PTBs have made Fielden look like he has rediscovered himself when he hasn't. Whenever Wigoon haven't been able to do quick PTBs he's looked like the same player that has sucked up salary cap since he's been there. No amount of eye-catching quick runs will change that, now behave.

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:50 am  

MacBlondie wrote: Not that I have to explain myself to some random, but Tomkins IS way ahead of Eastmond, only a one eyed Saints fan would think otherwise. People forget that even when Eastmond was fit, he was still anonymous for 3/4 of the game, popping up with an important try or break and then the mass ejaculation commenced. Tomkins has for more to his game and considering we only have the ginger whinger for one more season, yes, id have Fielden in a heartbeat given the comparative form of the 2. Which comparative form is that, his sterling work in marker tackles and tackle busts?

MacBlondie wrote: Not that I have to explain myself to some random, but Tomkins IS way ahead of Eastmond, only a one eyed Saints fan would think otherwise. People forget that even when Eastmond was fit, he was still anonymous for 3/4 of the game, popping up with an important try or break and then the mass ejaculation commenced. Tomkins has for more to his game and considering we only have the ginger whinger for one more season, yes, id have Fielden in a heartbeat given the comparative form of the 2. Which comparative form is that, his sterling work in marker tackles and tackle busts?

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:16 pm  

MacBlondie wrote:

People forget that even when Eastmond was fit, he was still anonymous for 3/4 of the game.......
....and considering we only have the ginger whinger for one more season, yes, id have Fielden in a heartbeat given the comparative form of the 2.

Riiiiight.

Re: Improvements for 2011 : Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:50 pm  

McClennan wrote:

Ludicrous statement which you'll see when Fielden gets thrown around like a rag doll again in Australia. .

You mean like James Graham was in the last world cup? Was made to look as average as they come by both NZ and Aus. I lost track of the times he was put on his booty.

Fielden had a lot to contend with that resulted in a loss of form and confidence that lasted until he got a decent coach. Last season, he wasnt far off his best. Fieldens best was, a level or 3 above that of james graham.

And surely, the worlds best prop (sic) would have his choice of aussie clubs, when in fact, its just one club that has shown an interest that will sign for next year...