Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:11 pm  

sir steve menzies wrote:

OMG !!!!
MORLEY IS THE BETS PROP !! GRAHAM ?? BURGESS ??
harrison is naff....o loughlin and tomkins ahead of him(sorry guys) even wilkin and he hasnt played most of the season
are you high mate ??

I'm a big fan of Harrison, he's got a great future ahead of him. I don't think he's a loose forward though, I reckon develop into a quality prop though.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:24 pm  

Warrington Wolfs fans = Mickey Carroll.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:35 pm  

dirtbag83 wrote:

Won't Soliola be playing centre next year?

Just hoping he is playing next season.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:36 pm  

Wire_74 wrote:

Above Saints anyway

How long for after tonight?

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:50 pm  

saint at wire wrote:

How long for after tonight?

I don't think we're in any position to wind up Wire fans just now, given that we lost to Catalans two weeks ago, played poorly against Quins and have yet to play Wakey (who are actually above Catalans and Quins). And, of course, we have lost two more players to injury. I think I'd be cautious if I were you or else tomorrow night you could look like a plonker.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:53 pm  

Rughead wrote:

I'm a big fan of Harrison, he's got a great future ahead of him. I don't think he's a loose forward though, I reckon develop into a quality prop though.

By far the most underrated YOUNGSTER in the league. I picked him out after last years wire/saints match. Quality player !

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:00 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

I don't think we're in any position to wind up Wire fans just now, given that we lost to Catalans two weeks ago, played poorly against Quins and have yet to play Wakey (who are actually above Catalans and Quins). And, of course, we have lost two more players to injury. I think I'd be cautious if I were you or else tomorrow night you could look like a plonker.

My comment was actually a tongue in cheek reply to a wire post. This is what I put on the wire board at the same time;
Re: Second "shock loss" of the season

saint at wire wrote:

Well it sounds like you made a better effort than we did against le cats. It's not the end of the world for you.
I think at this stage of the season, getting the squad injury free in preparation for the play offs is more important than win every game at all costs.

Makes next sat even more interesting.

which wasn't tongue in cheek, so your post doesn't really apply in terms of me being possibly being made to look a plonker.
For the record, I fear the worst.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:10 pm  

saint at wire wrote:

My comment was actually a tongue in cheek reply to a wire post. This is what I put on the wire board at the same time;
Re: Second "shock loss" of the season
which wasn't tongue in cheek, so your post doesn't really apply in terms of me being possibly being made to look a plonker.
For the record, I fear the worst.

Riiiiight. So I'm supposed to know by reading all the threads on Warrington's board that your post on a thread on the Saints board was tongue in cheek?

Didn't look tongue in cheek to me! Methinks you are running scared now ...

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:45 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Riiiiight. So I'm supposed to know by reading all the threads on Warrington's board that your post on a thread on the Saints board was tongue in cheek?

Didn't look tongue in cheek to me! Methinks you are running scared now ...

You are not supposed to know, in fact unless you knew me well you couldn't possibly know; thats why I had to point it out to you.
Or am I supposed to mark each post tongue in cheek/not tongue in cheek for everyone's benefit?
I'm not suggesting you should be arsed to look at my previous posts over the years but I am unfortunately a half empty sort of fan i.e. the worst kind; I'm always thinking we will lose just so I can be massively cheered up when, as is usually the case, we end up winning.

Not quite sure who I'm supposed to be running scared of though....
Will be in the East Stand with my wire in laws hoping we win next week, but its going to be a tough call with our injuries.

Re: Burgess wants Graham to join him at Souths : Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:54 pm  

saint at wire wrote:

Or am I supposed to mark each post tongue in cheek/not tongue in cheek for everyone's benefit?

Popping a little one of these in at the end is kind of handy.

I'm not suggesting you should be arsed to look at my previous posts over the years but I am unfortunately a half empty sort of fan i.e. the worst kind; I'm always thinking we will lose just so I can be massively cheered up when, as is usually the case, we end up winning.

Well, I can't say that I'm a whole lot different under Potter so I certainly don't begrudge your more realistic perspective.

Will be in the East Stand with my wire in laws hoping we win next week, but its going to be a tough call with our injuries.

I'm hoping to be there too but not with your Wire in-laws.