Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:49 pm  

I'd go with that Judgey. Looks like they want him big style. Why don't we just loan him until the end of the six nations and then he can come back after he's set a union try scoring record?

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:01 pm  

Hape was always leaving, Bath have already signed Dan Hipkiss to replace him.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:34 pm  

McClennan wrote:

I'd go with that Judgey. Looks like they want him big style. Why don't we just loan him until the end of the six nations and then he can come back after he's set a union try scoring record?

I am sure Bath would be most happy with that and no need to pay a fee to sign him for next season????

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:11 pm  

I think you should release Eastmond and show he's not holding up your club.
Then make a new increased offer to Graham letting it be known that you value him far more than Kyle.
Graham is the one you need to keep, in his case you really do need to put everything you possibly can into his offer of a new contract.
He's far more valuable to Saints and SL than Eastmond and I do hope the rumours a while ago of him signing a 5 year deal are true.
If it was between one or the other, Graham everytime.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:07 pm  

Father Ted wrote:

I think you should release Eastmond and show he's not holding up your club.
Then make a new increased offer to Graham letting it be known that you value him far more than Kyle.
Graham is the one you need to keep, in his case you really do need to put everything you possibly can into his offer of a new contract.
He's far more valuable to Saints and SL than Eastmond and I do hope the rumours a while ago of him signing a 5 year deal are true.
If it was between one or the other, Graham everytime.

Is he though? Graham is a fantastic player and IMO the best prop in the league but good props are easier to come by than good scrum halves that have potential to be great. Both players have potential to be saints legends and I would not like to have to choose between them. It looks as though that choice is not going to be saints' though.

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:08 pm  

It's nothing to do with money for Graham, it's about his dream of playing in oz. His decision won't change for a few more quid, he really loves saints

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:57 am  

Just a suggestion, if Kyle does go would it be worth having a look at Deacon as I cant think of too many scrum halfs that would just take over from Kyle?

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:06 am  

Saint Jamie B wrote:

Just a suggestion, if Kyle does go would it be worth having a look at Deacon as I cant think of too many scrum halfs that would just take over from Kyle?

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:16 am  

Saint Jamie B wrote:

Just a suggestion, if Kyle does go would it be worth having a look at Deacon as I cant think of too many scrum halfs that would just take over from Kyle?

Is that a joke?

Re: Super Kyle Eastmond : Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:41 am  

As Graham has been brought into the discussion, of course he is happy currently at a top club, but he must have some ambition and to try something different and that is Australia, doubt he is here for life, it is just a matter of when!