Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 8:40 am  

Twentyman wrote:

I'm not debating about who had the best forwards last season...I'm talking about this season, as it is relevant.

We have a set of forwards who can match anyone on their day. Take Walmsley out and we're struggling. That said, if we can retain Savelio, Thompson, Richards, Greenwood, Charnock etc they'll develop into a belting set of forwards.

I think Geoff Foster of haydock is one of them fans that get giddy if win a few games and start coming out with outrragous posts that's made him a laughing stock on many forums.

He will be one of them that claps like mad when Walsh makes a basic straight forward tackle or giz in his pants if Mose makes two hit ups in his 8 min spell.

For a team with the best pack ever, we do a lot of kicking. Teams mainly kick early in the set when they are struggling to make meters. Take Roby and Walmsley out that best ever pack and we have no meter makers.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:26 am  

St pete wrote:

I think XXXXX XXXXXX of haydock is one of them fans that get giddy if win a few games and start coming out with outrragous posts that's made him a laughing stock on many forums.

Should you be doing this kind of stuff to re in force your opinion.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:53 am  

St pete wrote:

I think XXXX is one of them fans that get giddy if win a few games and start coming out with outrragous posts that's made him a laughing stock on many forums.

He will be one of them that claps like mad when Walsh makes a basic straight forward tackle or giz in his pants if Mose makes two hit ups in his 8 min spell.

For a team with the best pack ever, we do a lot of kicking. Teams mainly kick early in the set when they are struggling to make meters. Take Roby and Walmsley out that best ever pack and we have no meter makers.

That's out of order.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 11:14 am  

Muggers posted some (excellent) photos a few months ago which had his name all over them. He's since had conversations with Rogue and co were areas were mentioned. Pete has hardly revealed a shocking truth.

Marry that with the fact that Muggers revels in rubbing people up (unnecessarily) the wrong way.

6 of 1 half a dozen of the other. Keep your knives in.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:05 pm  

SLS wrote:

That's out of order.

Why?

What exactly have I done? He's posted some photos with his name on and it's been mentioned he's from haydock.

So ive not posted anytning that's not been posted before have i ?

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:18 pm  

St pete wrote:

Why?

What exactly have I done? He's posted some photos with his name on and it's been mentioned he's from haydock.

So ive not posted anytning that's not been posted before have i ?

See clause 1.5 of the AUP, which expressly forbids posting other people's personal details, including identity. It's OK for Mugwump to do that, but you may not infer from that that he has given you, or anyone else, permission to do the same.

In any case it's irrelevant to the argument.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 2:33 pm  

Simeon Stylites wrote:

See clause 1.5 of the AUP, which expressly forbids posting other people's personal details, including identity. It's OK for Mugwump to do that, but you may not infer from that that he has given you, or anyone else, permission to do the same.

In any case it's irrelevant to the argument.

My bad, I didn't know that so I apologise to Geoff. Sorry.

Re: Tasi : Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:09 pm  

St pete wrote:

My bad, I didn't know that so I apologise to XXXXX Sorry.

Try again if you really want!!

Re: Tasi : Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:41 pm  

Forget about it.

Re: Tasi : Tue Sep 01, 2015 6:54 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Forget about it.

Thank you

I'm seriously sorry for it and didnt think.