Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:40 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

welsh wizard wrote:

Jesus H Christ

You are coming across like a bit of a bell end to be fair.

The trouble with you lot is you dont like being told the truth,if it had happened to your perfect players you would go up the wall,oh wait a mo

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:42 am  

wirefox wrote:

welsh wizard wrote:

Jesus H Christ

He would Definately not have thrown a punch

Top man

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:52 am  

welsh wizard wrote:

The trouble with you lot is you dont like being told the truth,if it had happened to your perfect players you would go up the wall,oh wait a mo

But it has happened to one of our perfect players though, and everyone has said he's deserved a ban. Comparing hitting a man who's still conscious to a man who's unconscious makes them fairly different in my book and probably a lot of other people's too.

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:12 pm  

welsh wizard wrote:

The trouble with you lot is you dont like being told the truth,if it had happened to your perfect players you would go up the wall,oh wait a mo

What on earth are you talking about? What is this "truth" that you refer to?

Nobody is defending him or saying he doesn't deserve a ban. Also, if the roles had been reversed on Sunday then I don't think one Saints fan would have compared it to the Flower incident.

I don't get what point you are trying to make.

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:32 pm  

SecondRowSaint wrote:

welsh wizard wrote:

The trouble with you lot is you dont like being told the truth,if it had happened to your perfect players you would go up the wall,oh wait a mo

But it has happened to one of our perfect players though, and everyone has said he's deserved a ban. Comparing hitting a man who's still conscious to a man who's unconscious makes them fairly different in my book and probably a lot of other people's too.

Whoooooosh

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

welsh wizard wrote:

The trouble with you lot is you dont like being told the truth,if it had happened to your perfect players you would go up the wall,oh wait a mo

What on earth are you talking about? What is this "truth" that you refer to?

Nobody is defending him or saying he doesn't deserve a ban. Also, if the roles had been reversed on Sunday then I don't think one Saints fan would have compared it to the Flower incident.



I don't get what point you are trying to make.

Ive compared the incident to the flower one because both hit men whilst they were on the floor,its irrelevant whether the man on the floor is unconcious or not,its unfortunate that sundays incident wasnt on the box otherwise we wouldnt be going around in circles posting about it,we are going to have to agree to disagree on this subject otherwise we could go on for weeks YG

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:55 pm  

welsh wizard wrote:

Whoooooosh

Ive compared the incident to the flower one because both hit men whilst they were on the floor,its irrelevant whether the man on the floor is unconcious or not,its unfortunate that sundays incident wasnt on the box otherwise we wouldnt be going around in circles posting about it,we are going to have to agree to disagree on this subject otherwise we could go on for weeks YG

How can you compare the incidents when one was recorded for all to see and could be endlessly replayed in slow motion to assess the damages done, whilst this was an incident which could only be seen in real time lasting about 10 secs.

It was fairly cold on Sunday maybe your brain was thermingly numbed in the thought process area.

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:13 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

welsh wizard wrote:

Whoooooosh

Ive compared the incident to the flower one because both hit men whilst they were on the floor,its irrelevant whether the man on the floor is unconcious or not,its unfortunate that sundays incident wasnt on the box otherwise we wouldnt be going around in circles posting about it,we are going to have to agree to disagree on this subject otherwise we could go on for weeks YG

How can you compare the incidents when one was recorded for all to see and could be endlessly replayed in slow motion to assess the damages done, whilst this was an incident which could only be seen in real time lasting about 10 secs.

It was fairly cold on Sunday maybe your brain was thermingly numbed in the thought process area.

JM i wish you would read my post thoroughly as you would see that i did mention that one incident was see on tele and the other wasnt and that we are a going to have agree to disagree about the said incident

Btw i wasnt the slightest bit cold as i had my lovely new thermal coat and my new widnes hat on

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:15 pm  

welsh wizard wrote:

Whoooooosh

Ive compared the incident to the flower one because both hit men whilst they were on the floor,its irrelevant whether the man on the floor is unconcious or not,its unfortunate that sundays incident wasnt on the box otherwise we wouldnt be going around in circles posting about it,we are going to have to agree to disagree on this subject otherwise we could go on for weeks YG

You think it's irrelevant that the person being hit is unconscious or not? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.

What a complete and utter tit you are.

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:27 pm  

Play nice children

Re: Angry Wello : Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:52 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

What on earth are you talking about? What is this "truth" that you refer to?

Nobody is defending him or saying he doesn't deserve a ban. Also, if the roles had been reversed on Sunday then I don't think one Saints fan would have compared it to the Flower incident.

I don't get what point you are trying to make.

Get a grip the Scousers are playing dirty again to try and win.