Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 3:45 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote: How did the awesome foursome go last night? Fielden, Vagana, Anderson and McDermott would still have the beating of them if they met now. http://www.redvee.net/forums/showthread ... e-foursome Instead of trying to derail almost every thread on here & redvee why don't you just F**K Off and post your inane drivel on the cherry & sh**e board, it's becoming so tedious now.

Rogues Gallery wrote: How did the awesome foursome go last night? Fielden, Vagana, Anderson and McDermott would still have the beating of them if they met now. http://www.redvee.net/forums/showthread ... e-foursome Instead of trying to derail almost every thread on here & redvee why don't you just F**K Off and post your inane drivel on the cherry & sh**e board, it's becoming so tedious now.

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:26 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

http://www.redvee.net/forums/showthread.php?25859-The-awesome-foursome

lmao that post is hilarious. Walmsley is your only decent forward now (and Sia when he bothers to turn up). The rest aren't even remotely awesome.

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:43 pm  

Wigg'n wrote:

lmao that post is hilarious. Walmsley is your only decent forward now (and Sia when he bothers to turn up). The rest aren't even remotely awesome.

Terrible effort, Amor is better than Walmesly for starters

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:03 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

Terrible effort, Amor is better than Walmesly for starters

wat

He's played half of the season...

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:17 pm  

Wigg'n wrote:

wat

He's played half of the season...

So has Walsh, does that make him a bad scrum half?
Awesome Wigan logic on show here

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:36 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

So has Walsh, does that make him a bad scrum half?
Awesome Wigan logic on show here

What about Lomax he has only played a third of the season, worst 'fullback in super league".

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:49 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

Terrible effort, Amor is better than Walmesly for starters

I would disagree with that. He can play the ball better but that's probably about it.

There is only one stat I could use to compare the two given the number of games Amor has missed through injury and that's average gain (unless I just compared the actual games they have both played in but it's too late on a Sunday evening for that kind of effort!).

Amor's average gain is 7.24m.
Walmsley's average gain is 8.43m.

(Mosoe's average gain is 8.29m)

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:22 pm  

curly990 wrote:

Instead of trying to derail almost every thread on here & redvee why don't you just F**K Off and post your inane drivel on the cherry & sh**e board, it's becoming so tedious now.

If you had bothered to look at who posted "The awesome foursome" thread on red vee then you would know why I responded. And as I presume that Masoe was one of these "awesome foursome" it was on topic.

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:01 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

I would disagree with that. He can play the ball better but that's probably about it.

There is only one stat I could use to compare the two given the number of games Amor has missed through injury and that's average gain (unless I just compared the actual games they have both played in but it's too late on a Sunday evening for that kind of effort!).

Amor's average gain is 7.24m.
Walmsley's average gain is 8.43m.

(Mosoe's average gain is 8.29m)

Jamie Peacocks is 6.29m which shows that a players average gain can't be the best way to decide who's a better prop.

I bet James Graham's wasn't always huge either in comparison to mountains like Walmsley or Masoe.

Re: Masoe = disgrace : Mon Sep 08, 2014 6:23 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Jamie Peacocks is 6.29m which shows that a players average gain can't be the best way to decide who's a better prop.

I bet James Graham's wasn't always huge either in comparison to mountains like Walmsley or Masoe.

I'm sure James Graham's was always huge actually. He used to win the metre maker award every year.

I didn't say average gain was the best way to decide who is the best prop. I said it was the only stat I could use because Amor has missed most of the season injured. I think it's a fairly reasonable indicator though as Walmsley's fun against London, for instance, will have been countered by his tougher efforts against Wigan or Leeds. While Amor hasn't had the benefit of the London games to boost his stats nor has he had the more restrictive opponents like Wigan to inhibit them.

On visuals alone though Walmsley generally appears to make more metres with the ball than Amor.