Re: Moon Sending Off : Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:04 pm  

He has been charged with a "C" offence with an EGP available.

Re: Moon Sending Off : Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:51 pm  

Suprised nobody noticed what Ablett did in that tackle just a split second before Moon hits him.

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:38 am  

I am sure you are going to tell us

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:16 am  

saint at wire wrote:

He has been charged with a "C" offence with an EGP available.

Just watched it again in slow mo, plenty of intent there lifting the shoulder to go for the head. Could have been a lot worse (broken jaw) if he had gone in with more momentum.

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:37 am  

saint at wire wrote: He has been charged with a "C" offence with an EGP available. As I predicted. Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's the wording from the Operational Rules – Section - Sentencing Guidelines Shoulder Charge B-D Indirect or secondary contact with the head of an attacking player C-E Direct initial contact with the head of an attacking player GRADE NORMAL SUSPENSION RANGE A.... NFA -1 B.....1 – 2 C.....2 -3 D.... 3-5 E.... 4-8 F.... 8+ or period suspension So I'm guessing Grade C and a two game ban if he submits an egp. http://media.therfl.co.uk/docs/On%20Fie ... -Final.pdf

saint at wire wrote: He has been charged with a "C" offence with an EGP available. As I predicted. Rogues Gallery wrote: Here's the wording from the Operational Rules – Section - Sentencing Guidelines Shoulder Charge B-D Indirect or secondary contact with the head of an attacking player C-E Direct initial contact with the head of an attacking player GRADE NORMAL SUSPENSION RANGE A.... NFA -1 B.....1 – 2 C.....2 -3 D.... 3-5 E.... 4-8 F.... 8+ or period suspension So I'm guessing Grade C and a two game ban if he submits an egp. http://media.therfl.co.uk/docs/On%20Fie ... -Final.pdf

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:05 pm  

Moon is not taking the EGP and is appealing in the hope of being let off.

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:09 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

Moon is not taking the EGP and is appealing in the hope of being let off.

Is that not a bit dicey at this point in the season?

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:13 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

:? Is that not a bit dicey at this point in the season?

Even he gets the max (3) game ban he'll only miss the first round play-off game, Don't forget Peacock got off without any ban when he was cited in the Leigh Cup game.

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:24 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Even he gets the max (3) game ban he'll only miss the first round play-off game, Don't forget Peacock got off without any ban when he was cited in the Leigh Cup game.

Couldn't you have said 'Don't forget Matt Bowen got off without any ban despite nearly taking someone's head off off the ball in the first game of the season'? Or is it just Leeds players who ever get away with anything?

Re: Moon Sending Off : Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:40 pm  

Big Jim Slade wrote: Couldn't you have said 'Don't forget Matt Bowen got off without any ban despite nearly taking someone's head off off the ball in the first game of the season'? Or is it just Leeds players who ever get away with anything? Matt Bowen was found not guilty with no charge (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4920) Jamie Peacock WAS charged, found guilty of a grade B offence and not banned (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5448) The only other person to fall in the latter category is Roby (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5476), however the relevence in the matter is naught, owing to the fact the discussion was about a Leeds player challenging a disciplinary decision, and nothing else. Leeds fans dont half seem to have a complex this week!

Big Jim Slade wrote: Couldn't you have said 'Don't forget Matt Bowen got off without any ban despite nearly taking someone's head off off the ball in the first game of the season'? Or is it just Leeds players who ever get away with anything? Matt Bowen was found not guilty with no charge (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?4920) Jamie Peacock WAS charged, found guilty of a grade B offence and not banned (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5448) The only other person to fall in the latter category is Roby (http://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5476), however the relevence in the matter is naught, owing to the fact the discussion was about a Leeds player challenging a disciplinary decision, and nothing else. Leeds fans dont half seem to have a complex this week!