Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:19 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Would he not have been dropped for Manu coming back?

Manu should now be dropped so we can have Greenwood back. Greenwood offered more than Manu. But Manu won't be dropped because under performing players are never dropped at Saints.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:26 pm  

I don't think so, he had previously been selected before Flanagan so I think he's above him in the pecking order.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:45 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Manu should now be dropped so we can have Greenwood back. Greenwood offered more than Manu. But Manu won't be dropped because under performing players are never dropped at Saints.

Very very harsh on Manu. He's been out for 8 weeks injured and came back in 30 degree heat. I think we can cut him some slack apart from that horrid missed tackle near the end.

Put it this way, we've give Mose 16 weeks so far to get fit and he's being excused by most on here so I think it's only fair Manu gets time also.

This pudding seems exempt from critisim on here yet the likes of LMS, Turner, Flash and wello have been ripped to shreds.

Good old Mose, as long as he keeps smiling we will all love him.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:23 pm  

How can walmsley get a ban and peacock not?

The Leigh guy who started it with peacock didn't even get charged!

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:24 pm  

St pete wrote:

How can walmsley get a ban and peacock not?

The Leigh guy who started it with peacock didn't even get charged!

Red hall logic.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:28 pm  

St pete wrote:

Very very harsh on Manu. He's been out for 8 weeks injured and came back in 30 degree heat. I think we can cut him some slack apart from that horrid missed tackle near the end.

Put it this way, we've give Mose 16 weeks so far to get fit and he's being excused by most on here so I think it's only fair Manu gets time also.

This pudding seems exempt from critisim on here yet the likes of LMS, Turner, Flash and wello have been ripped to shreds.

Good old Mose, as long as he keeps smiling we will all love him.

Or when he is poor we call him poor and when he is good we call him good.

LMS got good reviews last year when he was playing for a contract.
Mose got 1 or 2 good reviews this year.
Lance has had good reviews this year after being slated for the last 2.

Not everyone has fixed views on players.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:35 pm  

St pete wrote:

How can walmsley get a ban and peacock not?

The Leigh guy who started it with peacock didn't even get charged!

Before i start I'm not suggesting there is any favouritism in anyway towards Saints, but how can Roby be found guilty of a grade B offence and only get fined?

Also Walmsley being suspend smacks of inconsistency as Peacock was literally only 2 weeks ago. I really hoped that we stopped suspending and Red carding players for a punch up but it appears not.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:38 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

Or when he is poor we call him poor and when he is good we call him good.

LMS got good reviews last year when he was playing for a contract.
Mose got 1 or 2 good reviews this year.
Lance has had good reviews this year after being slated for the last 2.

Not everyone has fixed views on players.

So what's the difference anout giving Manu time to recover and giving Mose time?

The pudding seems untouchable on here. If he was English or a Aussie he would be getting slated. The fact he's Samoan (or a failed kiwi) with Afro and plays with a smile on his face (even we getting hammerd) then it seems ok.

I'm sure someone is boring enough to check this out for me. What's are win percentage with Mose , compared without Mose this season.

We seemed to be winning until the pudding came back from injury.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:39 pm  

dubairl wrote:

Before i start I'm not suggesting there is any favouritism in anyway towards Saints, but how can Roby be found guilty of a grade B offence and only get fined?

Also Walmsley being suspend smacks of inconsistency as Peacock was literally only 2 weeks ago. I really hoped that we stopped suspending and Red carding players for a punch up but it appears not.

I can't really comment on the Roby incident because I've only seen it the once and sure as hell don't want to watch it back.

Re: Disciplinary Charges : Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:42 pm  

St pete wrote:

So what's the difference anout giving Manu time to recover and giving Mose time?

The pudding seems untouchable on here. If he was English or a Aussie he would be getting slated. The fact he's Samoan (or a failed kiwi) with Afro and plays with a smile on his face (even we getting hammerd) then it seems ok.

I'm sure someone is boring enough to check this out for me. What's are win percentage with Mose , compared without Mose this season.

We seemed to be winning until the pudding came back from injury.

No one has said Manu should not be given time.
Saints fan has suggested he be dropped for Greenwood, but that's it.

Manu had some of the better stats going forwards from the last game with Walmsley. Having not seen the game, I would not suggest dropping anyone.

However given our pack is seen as weak, I would suggest Wellens to FB and an extra forward on the bench would help.