Re: Walsh Class : Wed May 14, 2014 7:57 am  

I see a lot of you are coming around to my way of thinking re Wheeler.

Re: Walsh Class : Wed May 14, 2014 6:12 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

I see a lot of you are coming around to my way of thinking re Wheeler.

and since you think Gaskell is far superior, you take him off Bradford when they relegated, we take Hampshire, its all good!

Re: Walsh Class : Wed May 14, 2014 9:40 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

and since you think Gaskell is far superior, you take him off Bradford when they relegated, we take Hampshire, its all good!

Gaskell is better than Wheeler no doubt about it.
But we'll stick with Williams and Hampshire thanks.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 7:00 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

I see a lot of you are coming around to my way of thinking re Wheeler.

Even a stopped clock, Rouguey.
None of us doubt Wheeler's talent, just his application and durability.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 8:47 am  

To be fair, I'd have Gaskell over wheeler

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 9:26 am  

St pete wrote:

To be fair, I'd have Gaskell over wheeler

To be fair, I don't want either.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 10:07 am  

St pete wrote:

To be fair, I'd have Gaskell over wheeler

Gaskell certainly managed more glory moments in the Lomaskell era than Wheeler has in the 12 years he's been playing for us.

Good hands, massive boot, occasionally ghosted through and made a lot of almost breaks, which you felt would start to turn into actual breaks when he got a touch older and stronger.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 10:11 am  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Gaskell certainly managed more glory moments in the Lomaskell era than Wheeler has in the 12 years he's been playing for us.

Good hands, massive boot, occasionally ghosted through and made a lot of almost breaks, which you felt would start to turn into actual breaks when he got a touch older and stronger.

Gaskell has a poor attitude and that's a fact. That is the only reason he's not at saints and has nothing to do with no ability.

Lee Gaskell would complement Walsh pretty well.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 10:18 am  

St pete wrote:

Gaskell has a poor attitude and that's a fact. That is the only reason he's not at saints and has nothing to do with no ability.

Lee Gaskell would complement Walsh pretty well.

I believe so. It was obvious there was something seriously amiss when he was shipped to Salford, even though we had few options in the halves.

Re: Walsh Class : Thu May 15, 2014 10:18 am  

St pete wrote:

Gaskell has a poor attitude and that's a fact. That is the only reason he's not at saints and has nothing to do with no ability.

Lee Gaskell would complement Walsh pretty well.

Yep.