Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:47 pm  

Albion wrote:

I'd be amazed if Wilkin doesn't get banned. Was right in front of me that one and it was nasty. Amor EGP would mean he's back for Hudds hopefully

got to be Charnock for friday then, surely

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:48 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

doesnt mean they'll get banned

They will get banned. Grade B has a range of 1 - 2 matches. If Amor submits EGP then he will get 1 match. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilkin gets 2 matches. You would never of guessed we where playing Leeds next would you.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:50 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

got to be Charnock for friday then, surely

Got a feeling that Brown will go with Wello at 6 and Hohaia at 7.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:52 pm  

Wheeler and Lance will more than likely be the halves on Friday.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:54 pm  

saint87 wrote:

They will get banned. Grade B has a range of 1 - 2 matches. If Amor submits EGP then he will get 1 match. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilkin gets 2 matches. You would never of guessed we where playing Leeds next would you.

could just as easily not get banned as a 1 match ban would be reduced to 0 with egp

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:58 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

could just as easily not get banned as a 1 match ban would be reduced to 0 with egp

That would be a Grade A offence not Grade B.

If you submit EGP then you get the lower number. So for a Grade B, an EGP will mean 1 match.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:35 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

got to be Charnock for friday then, surely

Lance , Percival and Wheeler are likely to be fit so I doubt it.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:06 pm  

Albion wrote:

I'd be amazed if Wilkin doesn't get banned. Was right in front of me that one and it was nasty. Amor EGP would mean he's back for Hudds hopefully

Can't we just get Ganson to write it off

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:16 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

could just as easily not get banned as a 1 match ban would be reduced to 0 with egp

Doesn't work like that unfortunately. An EGP is still a guilty plea and so will automatically attract punishment. Had the charge been Grade A then Amor would have received a fine only. But with it being a Grade B, he simply gets the lower of the range which is a one match ban.

I'm really annoyed at Jon Wilkin. He knew we depended on him in the absence of Luke Walsh. Why couldn't he have been disciplined for once?

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:18 pm  

St pete wrote:

Can't we just get Ganson to write it off

With the amount of the refs are super biased against us sad face sad face mud he was flinging some of it was bound to stick.

Given Amors lack of a record, reckless action, he might MIGHT get away with an egp and 0 games, but I wouldn't hold my breath ...

Well, if Nathan Ashe can beat Leeds ....