Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:20 pm  

Just been reading the league express and notices Martyn Sadler saying Gaskell was shocking for Rochdale surely he should be standing out at that level or is it a case of him just can't be bothered playing at that level and just happy with whatever he get payed for playing for them

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:13 pm  

The treatment Lee Gaskell is getting at Saints is very poor imo. He should be a starting 6 ahead of Lance Hohaia every day of the week. Gaskell with a big run in the team will only improve and if we are not careful we could lose a potentially very good player.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:09 pm  

1984saints wrote:

Just been reading the league express and notices Martyn Sadler saying Gaskell was shocking for Rochdale surely he should be standing out at that level or is it a case of him just can't be bothered playing at that level and just happy with whatever he get payed for playing for them

You have taken what Sadler said completely out of context there. He suggested that Gaskell, like Richard Owen whose awful performance was on Premier Sports for all to see, was unhappy to be there and that playing for a Championship 1 side was, to those players, like a punishment. He also said that this was a very unwise use of the dual registration system.

And I agree with him wholeheartedly. Gaskell, like Owen, is bound to feel punished. Unlike Owen, Gaskell has played in a first grade grand final. To be unceremoniously stuck in a Championship 1 team when at the outset of the season his coach was saying he had a kicking game like Danny Brough is a terrible way to treat a player, particularly a young player.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:20 pm  

I think of the 3 so far, Biscuit Wheeler is the best of a very average bunch.

Lance, Gaskell and Wheeler have not really put in an effort that would make me think, hmmm we must keep them in at 6.

If he gets another chance he will have to seize it on the day as he can't live off the back end of 2011. He's a pro player now so needs to show up, the next time he is picked.

I would have liked him to get 6 games, but Brown has now seen all 3 at half, at the moment all 3 could lose out to an academy player, a new recruit from another club or even to Wellens.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:26 pm  

Why is all this going on?
Surely there's no long term future with/for Wilkin at 7?
Gaskell, IMO, is a talented lad who is suffering from a lack of first team rugby.
If he doesn't get selected he may well come to the conclusion his future may be better at another club.
There will be plenty better clubs than Rochdale after his signature, that's for sure.
You never know Wire might be after him. Briers ain't many years left in him. Ratchford isn't good enough at 6 which leaves them with O'Brien and Myler who basically are scrum halves.
The old saying "Use him or lose him" does seem appropriate.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:45 pm  

Father Ted wrote:

Why is all this going on?
Surely there's no long term future with/for Wilkin at 7?
Gaskell, IMO, is a talented lad who is suffering from a lack of first team rugby.
If he doesn't get selected he may well come to the conclusion his future may be better at another club.
There will be plenty better clubs than Rochdale after his signature, that's for sure.
You never know Wire might be after him. Briers ain't many years left in him. Ratchford isn't good enough at 6 which leaves them with O'Brien and Myler who basically are scrum halves.
The old saying "Use him or lose him" does seem appropriate.

It all depends who Saints can get, if we can't get anyone then it would be daft to outcast him.

If we get a Brough then Gaskell needs to prove his worth, but we should not assume that Gaskell is the only option,, even if he maybe the best option today.

I think Wilkin will stay as 7 for the rest of the year. So it's up to Gaskell, Lance or Wheeler to put their hand up and grab the 6 shirt, so far I'd say performances mean none of them are nailed on.

If they are not careful Brown could easily go to the academy and throw a 16 - 18 year old in. It would not shock me.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:37 pm  

If Brown does not play Gaskell in the next 2 games then maybe Brown has arrived at the same conclusion of Rush last year that he is not good enough for first team selection. If Gaskell has seen the Rochdale game as a form of punishment and as a result has performed badly then there would be a question of his temperment and attitude.
Maybe he has mentally already committed himself to another club .

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:42 pm  

Judder Man wrote:

If Gaskell has seen the Rochdale game as a form of punishment and as a result has performed badly then there would be a question of his temperment and attitude.

Oh get real. If he has seen it as a punishment maybe that is because he is discouraged and his confidence is shot. It may be nothing whatsoever to do with his temperament or attitude. It could be simply be a response to a truism: he is being discarded. If you are a young bloke who always wanted to play for his local team, and had been chosen as first number six to play in your home team's grand final and then suddenly, without warning, you find yourself cast aside twice, and for a player who isn't even as good as you in your position, it would be a fully human response to feel down about it and to find it difficult to lift yourself to play.

We have just been told about Brett Seymour at Hull FC, another halfback berated by fans and criticised by his coach, etc. He was suffering from depression and tried to kill himself with his car. Care needs to be taken, particularly with young and possibly impresisonable players, because it could be a young man's dreams and hopes that are being destroyed. It must be humiliating for him to have to turn out for Rochdale having once been trusted enough to play in a first grade grand final.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:02 pm  

The fact that Gaskell has played in a Grand Final is completely irrelevant. Leroy Rivett played in a grand Final and scored four tries in Challenge Cup Final.
I've always thought Gaskell was a decent prospect, but when three or four coaches "don't fancy him" it does make you think.

The only problem I always had with him was that I didn't know what his best position was, even in the academy grades he was always being moved about.

Gaskell has two choices, sulk or go to Rochdale/Whitehaven and play his arris off to show his capabilities. Even if Saint don't want him other clubs will be looking at his character.

Re: Gaskell : Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:23 pm  

Don't exaggerate Rogues. Two out of three coaches do not like Gaskell, although how three games including a complete tonking is enough to judge anyone's capabilities is beyond me. Anyway one out of the three coaches (Simmons) kept faith with Gaskell. But then he was brought over in part because he was very good with young players and at the time Saints wanted to do stuff on the cheap.