Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:50 am  

Last night, Moore said on Twitter: “Got sacked. Sorry to all the Widnes supporters. Was nice while it lasted.

“Think I might change my career, become a lollipop man.”

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:49 am  

SilverW0lf wrote: The Daily Star is reporting that "sources claim Moore may have failed an in-house drugs test for a recreational substance" http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/245675/Vikings-boot-out-Scott-Moore/ I was going to post this yesterday after talking to a Widnes Fan but didn't want to put anything potentially inaccurate

SilverW0lf wrote: The Daily Star is reporting that "sources claim Moore may have failed an in-house drugs test for a recreational substance" http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/245675/Vikings-boot-out-Scott-Moore/ I was going to post this yesterday after talking to a Widnes Fan but didn't want to put anything potentially inaccurate

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:44 pm  

Whilst we are talking about young lads, boys will be boys etc, they're getting paid very good money for playing rugby. A good portion of them, and I include Scott in this, are thick as mince. You'd think they'd realise they're onto a good thing and stay out of trouble.

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:57 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Whilst we are talking about young lads, boys will be boys etc, they're getting paid very good money for playing rugby. A good portion of them, and I include Scott in this, are thick as mince. You'd think they'd realise they're onto a good thing and stay out of trouble.

He's pretty much got away with it each time though. I do agree though, I can't believe they risk taking recreational drugs when playing. They're finished at 35, take as much as you want then, just not whilst you may be banned for doing it.

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:43 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

Whilst we are talking about young lads, boys will be boys etc, they're getting paid very good money for playing rugby. A good portion of them, and I include Scott in this, are thick as mince. You'd think they'd realise they're onto a good thing and stay out of trouble.

WTF!!!!!!


Your a mod as well?

Whats going on at all?

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:00 pm  

They've got new mods?

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:03 pm  

Billinge_Lump wrote:

They've got new mods?

Yes, two new mods and im disgusted I've not been offered the job. Even my beloved saintsfan didn't get one either!


Fix! Fix! Fix! Fix!

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:15 pm  

I've been here since dick docked and am continually passed over for promotion

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:08 pm  

I was brushing up on the AUP and some other interesting bits last night.

As far as I can see repeating the daily star link does not come under sub justice as

Under British law, a matter becomes sub judice - from the moment a charge is filed or hearing arranged and until a resolution is reached -

As far as I'm aware Scott has not beeen charged with anything or any hearing arranged. But I'll keep an eye on it as it may come under libelous if there is no case.

Re: Scott Moore : Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:35 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

I was brushing up on the AUP and some other interesting bits last night.

As far as I can see repeating the daily star link does not come under sub justice as

Under British law, a matter becomes sub judice - from the moment a charge is filed or hearing arranged and until a resolution is reached -

As far as I'm aware Scott has not beeen charged with anything or any hearing arranged. But I'll keep an eye on it as it may come under libelous if there is no case.

Linking a press release can't be libellous to the site regardless of the outcome.