Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:48 pm  

nohalfbacks wrote:

Yes Saints have coped very well and looking at the bigger picture the emergence of Lomax and Gaskell is a big bonus and might not have happened had Pryce not been injured and Eastmond not been such a big wuss.
There was an interesting stat on the Wigan board a while ago showing that Wigan have suffered more injuries than Saints including first choice players Fielden and Roberts out all season and Gleeson having to be released for personal reasons. Not complaining though because injuries do occur and it is a squad game.

Fair enough , I think it also matters where you get your injuries though.

As for Wigan, Gleeson getting the boot was a club call, Roberts as far as I know has been playing in the reserves and Fielden has been our Perry.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:52 pm  

No1 Saint wrote:

Fair enough , I think it also matters where you get your injuries though.

As for Wigan, Gleeson getting the boot was a club call, Roberts as far as I know has been playing in the reserves and Fielden has been our Perry.

They were still three first choice players at the start of the season. Roberts has played intermittently in the reserves to try and get fit but eventually had to go back under the knife. He was one of the stand out players in the SL until his unfortunate injury.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:54 pm  

nohalfbacks wrote:

They were still three first choice players at the start of the season. Roberts has played intermittently in the reserves to try and get fit but eventually had to go back under the knife. He was one of the stand out players in the SL until his unfortunate injury.

He's that highly thought of he was kept in the reserves when back from injury

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:56 pm  

St pete wrote:

He's that highly thought of he was kept in the reserves when back from injury

Because he wasn't fully fit with what could turn out to be a career ending injury!

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:58 pm  

bugger of back to oz, we dont needwin at all cost coaches like you . good riddance.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:00 pm  

Fairy fielden wouldn't get into the saints side even with all our injuries. If Roberts fielden and druggie Gleeson are your excuses you really are scraping the barrel. After all, you brought back the other goon druggie hero hock As your saviour, midway through the season.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:05 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Fairy fielden wouldn't get into the saints side even with all our injuries. If Roberts fielden and druggie Gleeson are your excuses you really are scraping the barrel. After all, you brought back the other goon druggie hero hock As your saviour, midway through the season.

They are not excuses if you care to actually read my previous posts!

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:06 pm  

How you can say he his an horrible man is the most stupidest thing i've ever actually heard. He's a gent and his tactics are well within the law where is the evidence to show his tactics produce injurys?

I can't actually wait to go and see you get smashed by leeds.

If we didnt win the challenge cup we'd have won the gf. It's been proven time and time before winning the challenge cup changes your mentality. It's interesting to know that we went all season with only 3 defeats, then we have 3 after the challenge cup? the writing is on the wall.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:07 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

Fairy fielden wouldn't get into the saints side even with all our injuries. If Roberts fielden and druggie Gleeson are your excuses you really are scraping the barrel. After all, you brought back the other goon druggie hero hock As your saviour, midway through the season.

How sad was it when the inbreeds gave the coke head hock a heroes return after coming back from a two year drug ban.

Just shows how low that club has gone under maguire.

Re: Au reviour to Maguire : Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:10 pm  

WQrriors wrote:

How you can say he his an horrible man is the most stupidest thing i've ever actually heard. He's a gent and his tactics are well within the law where is the evidence to show his tactics produce injurys?

I can't actually wait to go and see you get smashed by leeds.

If we didnt win the challenge cup we'd have won the gf. .

Oh yes yes yes this is more like it .. keep it coming. Just makes beating you sweeter