Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:03 am  

St pete wrote:

One of the greatest coaches of all time selected lomax, so I'm pretty sure he knows what he's doing .

Well lets see what one of the greatest coaches of all times does not next weekend, but against Australia, I feel certain he knows now some of Saturday's team are simply not good enough! and on Saturday's performance they will walk over us.

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:32 am  

jaybs wrote:

Well lets see what one of the greatest coaches of all times does not next weekend, but against Australia, I feel certain he knows now some of Saturday's team are simply not good enough! and on Saturday's performance they will walk over us.

So that will be lomax fault ?

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:43 am  

Lomax missed a bad tackle. Unfortunately that will stick in people's minds, but otherwise he had a decent game, I though.

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:07 am  

Dux wrote:

Lomax missed a bad tackle. Unfortunately that will stick in people's minds, but otherwise he had a decent game, I though.

Funny they not mentioning the bad pass by widdop though isn't it

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:13 am  

St pete wrote:

So that will be lomax fault ?

Are you not able to take a comment as it is made? it is my opinion and that is all, Lomax is not international standard currently, I have said I rate him so highly both as a player and person, he did so well to come back this last season as he did, such respect!

Okay to please some?? Widdop made a bad tackle, I have never been blinded to truth on any player, even players from any club I support, some here seem to take offence at any comments about Saints players, it is just an opinion as I said.

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:52 am  

St pete wrote:

Funny they not mentioning the bad pass by widdop though isn't it

Had he made the right decision to miss Whitehead out and hit Lomax who was linking in perfectly behind him we had a great opportunity to potentially score down that left side.

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:15 pm  

lomax wasn't the reason we lost, people go on about extra links etc but imo shaul would offer that x factor that we don't have atm, he backs up and has pace to burn, just one chance and he could change a match which atm we don't seem to have,

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:42 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Had he made the right decision to miss Whitehead out and hit Lomax who was linking in perfectly behind him we had a great opportunity to potentially score down that left side.

But the pass cost us 6 points at a very crucial part of the game

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:48 pm  

It really all depends how you want the fullback to play. If you want him to be the "extra half-back" then it's either Lomax or Ratchford. If you want someone to take you forward then it's Sarginson, if you want a try poacher/back up player then it's Shaul..
It's a pity that O'Loughlin is unfit as he could be the extra ball playing forward that we sadly lacked on Saturday.

Re: Lomax flops for England : Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:54 pm  

Dux wrote:

Lomax missed a bad tackle. Unfortunately that will stick in people's minds, but otherwise he had a decent game, I though.

He had a very good game,we must remember that was his second cap but he should have made that tackle,International games are won on mistakes or a piece of brilliance usually
.