Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 9:57 am  

I'm glad to hear that Burns took the game by the scruff of the neck. I hope it continues when Wilkin is back.

The stick that KC is getting on here and especially on the other forum is just daft if you ask me. Our attack seems to be a little toothless at the moment, but I'm not sure what people expect when our two most instinctive attacking players (Walsh and Lomax), two of our best attacking back rowers (Vea and Greenwood) and our best attacking centre are all sitting in the stand.

The vibe on the forums reminds me of the first two thirds of 2006. Everyone was skriking about Saints playing dull rugby then as well. If this season ends up anything like that one then I'll take that.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 10:18 am  

Dux wrote:

I'm glad to hear that Burns took the game by the scruff of the neck. I hope it continues when Wilkin is back.

The stick that KC is getting on here and especially on the other forum is just daft if you ask me. Our attack seems to be a little toothless at the moment, but I'm not sure what people expect when our two most instinctive attacking players (Walsh and Lomax), two of our best attacking back rowers (Vea and Greenwood) and our best attacking centre are all sitting in the stand.

The vibe on the forums reminds me of the first two thirds of 2006. Everyone was skriking about Saints playing dull rugby then as well. If this season ends up anything like that one then I'll take that.

I totally agree and last night was a great result. I wasn't confirdent at all if im being honest.

We've had Vea, percy, greenwood all missing from our edge attack which was very good at the start of the year. All three of them was busting tackles on the edges and we've lost that.

Obvously walsh is massive lost and don't neee to go into that.

We've been a boring side for long time now. Injuries or no injuries we was boring before KC, we was boring with Brown, boring under Rush, boring under Royce and very very boring under Potter.

The days of us plsying champaign rugby have well gone when the likes of newy, scully, longy, kc and co went. No team plays that type of rugby anymore on a regular basis. Like other teams, we have our moments but ultimatey we are not great to watch.

This is the reason Id like to see us try and get a good strike player in the backs. Someone that can make a break out of nothing and be a go to player. Finding one is hard and with the money in the NRL it's hard to bring one over.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 1:39 pm  

St pete wrote:

I totally agree and last night was a great result. I wasn't confirdent at all if im being honest.

We've had Vea, percy, greenwood all missing from our edge attack which was very good at the start of the year. All three of them was busting tackles on the edges and we've lost that.

Obvously walsh is massive lost and don't neee to go into that.

We've been a boring side for long time now. Injuries or no injuries we was boring before KC, we was boring with Brown, boring under Rush, boring under Royce and very very boring under Potter.

The days of us plsying champaign rugby have well gone when the likes of newy, scully, longy, kc and co went. No team plays that type of rugby anymore on a regular basis. Like other teams, we have our moments but ultimatey we are not great to watch.

This is the reason Id like to see us try and get a good strike player in the backs. Someone that can make a break out of nothing and be a go to player. Finding one is hard and with the money in the NRL it's hard to bring one over.

The 2006 team was a once in a lifetime team, and today's salary cap, plus draw from RU and the NRL means we won't see anything similar for a long time. We were also the entertainers in the 70s and 80s, when we were the perennial bridesmaids, Id really prefer not to go back to that.

Plus you need to earn the right to play entertaining rugby, by first building a solid base, and confidence. That will take time after the horrendous injuries of the last few years. But to go away to Hull and win is always a good result, regardless of the brand of rugby.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 2:36 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

The 2006 team was a once in a lifetime team, and today's salary cap, plus draw from RU and the NRL means we won't see anything similar for a long time.

But, as I mentioned in my above post, people griped and moaned throughout the majority of the 2006 season about the style of rugby we were playing. The fact that hardly anyone remembers that now illustrates clearly that what really matters is winning.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 4:23 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

It's a good win considering we were without a scrum half and didn't have any backrowers available to fill in for him.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 7:29 pm  

The Catalan loss does not look too bad either does it???


Wigan seem to have been owned by that same team.

So glad I changed the kicker in my fantasy team.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 9:47 pm  

LFC Saint did you actually go to the game?

In the context it was a must win game for both sides, who pulled their tripe out and were shattered at the end.
No a pretty game but both sides gave their all.
Hard to criticise KC with what was available and the circumstances.
We scored two cracking tries and scrambled well in defence.
FC fans will probably consider they were unlucky, which in a way they were.
Make no mistake this was a massive win,especially after the Pies result today.
Lfc Saint do you have a hidden anti-KC agenda?

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sat May 23, 2015 10:10 pm  

The players are putting there bodies on the line i have no complaints about the players. My gripe is that they're being held back by poor coaching.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sun May 24, 2015 8:31 am  

LFC Saint wrote:

The players are putting there bodies on the line i have no complaints about the players. My gripe is that they're being held back by poor coaching.

I don,t think its poor coaching but probably match tactics, we where looking pretty good the first part of the season and a lot more entertaining. KC is probably playing a limited percentage game at the moment because of the absence of pivotal players, everything is coming off Burns at the moment and is using the pack to give Burns options which is a bit one dimensional at times.
We have not had a settled 1st choice attacking 1 to 7 for 2 or 3 consecutive games and thats how it will be for the rest of the season, so KC is on a learning curve on what situations work best without too much experimentation.

Re: Hull vs Saints : Sun May 24, 2015 8:41 am  

Judder Man wrote:

I don,t think its poor coaching but probably match tactics, we where looking pretty good the first part of the season and a lot more entertaining.

I would disagree with that. Regardless of who has been on the pitch this season we have been playing the same style, and giving away as many penalties, and the odd try here and there aside, we have been dull to watch. We do seem to have stopped the interception gifts though.