Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 5:31 am  

St pete wrote:

I beleive he's got the best stats in super league for a prop at the moment. He does do long mins. He's not your 15 min prop, he's easily capable of 30 min spells.

He's a 10/15 minute first stint prop. His stats dont surprise me though. Id put him, Hill and Lynch up as the best 3 so far this season.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:20 am  

bishops finger wrote:

He's a 10/15 minute first stint prop. His stats dont surprise me though. Id put him, Hill and Lynch up as the best 3 so far this season.

He's never a 10 min prop. Can get a good 30 mins out of him no problem.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:15 am  

bishops finger wrote:

He's a 10/15 minute first stint prop. His stats dont surprise me though. Id put him, Hill and Lynch up as the best 3 so far this season.

That's quite a bizarre statement. We're not talking about Mose here you know.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:20 am  

St pete wrote:

I beleive he's got the best stats in super league for a prop at the moment. He does do long mins. He's not your 15 min prop, he's easily capable of 30 min spells.

Mose did 24 min 27 sec in the first half yesterday but contributed about 5 mins in the pack and 20 secs at stand off. THe bit where he was stand off he dropped the ball.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:33 am  

Judder Man wrote:

Mose did 24 min 27 sec in the first half yesterday but contributed about 5 mins in the pack and 20 secs at stand off. THe bit where he was stand off he dropped the ball.

I think he did two carries in that spell. Awful contribution

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:51 am  

The thing with Mose, isn't he supposed to be trying to promote himself back to the NRL next season? Unless hes already signed a deal, he's not doing himself any favours if he wants a good payday.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:55 am  

The Chief wrote:

The thing with Mose, isn't he supposed to be trying to promote himself back to the NRL next season? Unless hes already signed a deal, he's not doing himself any favours if he wants a good payday.

Don't know if he's signed for anyone but he's going. I'll be happy to see back of him. He's not a team player, he bone idle and picks his games.

Don't get me wrong, he's had a few very good games in his spell here but they are few and far between.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:13 am  

I'm not into measuring minutes on and off. But yesterday he had one spell. 2nd half I think. Came on, did nowt. Was put into a massive gap and made hard work of getting tackled then went off.

Could not fault him defensively yesterday. Thought all the pack tackled their hearts out.

Never sure with Mose. Seems he is one or the other. Defensively I thought he really put some effort in, attacking wise????

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:49 am  

If Tasi is nailed on as it seems to replace Mose, will he be a better player for us? Obviously be better value for money.

Re: Alex walmsley : Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:01 am  

St. Rughead wrote:

If Tasi is nailed on as it seems to replace Mose, will he be a better player for us? Obviously be better value for money.

From what Mose has brought to the table most weeks, it's not going to be hard to replace him. If it is Tasi, and he gives us three good spells each week then we sorted.

When Mose is on his game he's very good. He was great in his first spell on good friday and tipped the momentuem our way but he can't do it regular or should I say can't be bothered doing it regular.

He's 6ft 7in, he weighs 18st, he should be knocking plsyers into next week with the ball but won't run his size.