Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:38 pm  

I really don't see any issue with any of the forwards. They've done their job. Both going forward and in defence.

I mean, you can't churn out 200 yard games every game.

And let's not forget that this is the start of the season.

Our problems are purely a result of diminishing attacking strength from 1-7.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:39 pm  

SLS wrote:

I don't know what game they watched but I'd be writing Wigan's season off based on yesterday. They've no hope of beating a Saints team that's anything like fit. None.

Comedy gold

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:52 pm  

St pete wrote:

I see turner Kept his missed tackles up even when he's not playing on the edges.

Why pick on Turner? Josh Jones missed SIX tackles and only made 18. That was a worse ratio than Turner and maybe explains why Jones isn't played as often as we would like.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:55 pm  

To be honest, I thought Jones played well, too. Always hits hard in the tackle and his footwork usual gives him a break or two.

I'd like to see him spelled in the back row or at lock for twenty mins in the second half. His agility is a nightmare for tiring forwards to defend against.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 5:33 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Why pick on Turner? Josh Jones missed SIX tackles and only made 18. That was a worse ratio than Turner and maybe explains why Jones isn't played as often as we would like.

I've said he missed 6 tackles and that's not good enough. I've said all year that turner needs to sort his defence out as he plays centre and if you miss tackles in the centre you get hurt.

He played 6 on Friday and still missed 4 tackles. Every time I see the stats he missed 4 tackles.

Picking on Turner . I've also said all year that greenwood misses far to many tackles and the worry is, they defend on the same edge!!!

I'm always fair on my critique. I may not think Turber is good enough but ill paraise him of he plays well. That's with all the players. I try to be fair as I can.

I remember you saying I picked on Wilkin few years back and then the following season i gave him so much credit for Ho's role in plsying 7 that's people said I had a man crush on him.

Call me what you will, I always call it as I see it and always fair.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 5:35 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Cry me a river.

I'm not saying anything as I know I'll kop a ban unlike you. you'll go crying to your littke bum chum on here again.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 6:19 pm  

St pete wrote:

I'm not saying anything as I know I'll kop a ban unlike you. you'll go crying to your littke bum chum on here again.

If you weren't chasing me round like some kind of stalker you'd know I have banned fewer people than probably every other mod or admin - in ten years.

And "bum chum"???????

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 6:29 pm  

Seriously, St. Pete you need to cool it.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 7:01 pm  

St pete wrote:

I always call it as I see it and always fair.

It's not, but that's another debate.

Re: Derby Stats : Sat Apr 04, 2015 7:34 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Seriously, St. Pete you need to cool it.

Are you a mod on here?

Honestly mate your posts are cringing. I've found St Pete to be a rational poster who's honest and up for a decent debate. Completely opposite to yourself who's posts these last couple of days have been pure drivel and pointless.

Don't let the 'power' go to your head.