St pete wrote:
His first 9 min spell in the grand final showed he has bad fitness issues. After 7 mins he was down on his knees again totally shattered.
This is pure confirmation bias. How about mentioning any one of several others that ALSO looked jiggered.
In any case - props are judged by the PURPOSE. Amor is more of an endurance forward whilst Mose's job is to suck in defenders and dominate the opponent's physical players.
Mose smashed Wigan's pack. He smashed Wigan's pack AT Wigan. And let's not forget him smashing the Catalans pack - which I believe is a better pack than Wigan's anyway. Certainly more physical.
You think Mose is a defensive liability. I'll bet you there aren't many forwards who relish running anywhere near him.
Maybe I'm just used to seeing proper props in the saints shirt over the years like fairleigh, graham, Britt, Apollo etc.
What do you mean by "proper" props? You've named at least three distinct types of prop (one of whom was a second row for all but 18 months of his career) - two of which would be unlikely bed-fellows in any pack playing today.
Mose is a specialist prop whose assets are narrowly defined. Judged on his own he's a weak link. Judged in conjunction with a TEAM of props he's perfect for the job.
All I know, if Lms or a Amor played with the lack of effort Mose did, you lot would be up in arms.
There's a difference between playing to the best of your ability with 25lbs strapped to your back and not giving a damn. Maybe one day you'll understand this.