Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:11 am  

Th'ump wrote:

I don't recall him being sent off before. He's not a malicious player (annoyingly too much of the contrary), and I think it was clumsy rather than intended.

Still think he'll get a ban, because we're Saints and lady luck hasn't been our friend for some years.

If we are being honest, he do deserve a ban. It's the rules. Shoulder charge with head contact and was late. We won't see big Alex until next season.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:34 am  

Th'ump wrote:

Shall we start a collection for some rope?

Tool.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:38 am  

Th'ump wrote:

Shall we start a collection for some rope?

Bad.......

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:27 am  

Can't have it both ways, Moon was rightly sent off as was AW.
Just a bad decision and it cost us but let's move onto next week

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:14 pm  

Th'ump wrote:

Shall we start a collection for some rope?

That's classless, even for a scouser.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:24 pm  

2 match ban as per Joel Moon. Funny how that game mirrored our game the other week. Great effort from 12 men.
Mods - if that Th'ump character is allowed to stay on here then shame on you. An absolute bellend.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:34 pm  

Th'ump wrote:

Shall we start a collection for some rope?

ooof

Oh no he di'int

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:52 pm  

ryano wrote:

2 match ban as per Joel Moon. Funny how that game mirrored our game the other week. Great effort from 12 men.

I think Walmsley has had a ban already this season hasn't he? Wasn't he banned at the same time as LMS and Wilkin for the Leeds game at LP? If so then I can see AW getting three matches as it was direct contact to the head, which is a Grade C rather than a Grade B (indirect contact). He won't have EGP available put it that way.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:21 pm  

FlexWheeler wrote:

ooof

Oh no he di'int

Its a similar classless comment that got his previous user name banned, no fixing some internet warriors.

Re: Walmsley : Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:54 pm  

ryano wrote:

Mods - if that Th'ump character is allowed to stay on here then shame on you. An absolute bellend.

Ironically, whilst I don't see how I've broken the AUP, you have clearly fallen foul of rule 2.1: "We will not tolerate threatening or abusive behaviour. Anyone who is found guilty of acting this way toward any other member risks being banned from RLFANS."