Just going back to the Leeds game at LP earlier this season. I think Walsh's absence played a big part in Hohaia's performance against Leeds. I know Lomax played more of a half-back role that night but Hohaia was the only recognised 'half' in the side. I often think he's guilty of relying on players around him at times to do bits of his work for him, but that day he didn't have that really. He stepped up, organised well, kicked well and lead us around the field in the way I think we'd all like to see. Just because Walsh's on the team sheet doesn't mean he needs to go back into his shell.
Turner at 6. In my opinion, we rely almost too heavily on Walsh as it is. Pretty much everything goes through him. What would we gain by putting a centre in there who has no kicking game no organisational qualities? Granted we haven't seen him play there on a regular basis, but either way I suspect we'd be relying even more on Walsh than we already do. Imagine Turner and Percival defending down the left edge together as well? Not sure about that really.
Hohaia and Walsh are our first choice halves IMO. Injury permitting, keep them there together and let them develop as a partnership.
I am the hash browns of rlfans 
