Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:19 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

No agenda, but it's a reasonable question to ask why when Walsh and Wilkin are out, he's not featuring?

Maybe he's injured as well.

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:32 pm  

St pete wrote:

Maybe he's injured as well.

which is fair enough, why not say it?

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:33 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

which is fair enough, why not say it?

Previous history would lead to saints fans rioting if he signed a new contract if they announced he was injured?

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:40 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

Previous history would lead to saints fans rioting if he signed a new contract if they announced he was injured?

quite possibly.

Still think if we let him go he'll go amazingly for someone else!

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:46 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

quite possibly.

Still think if we let him go he'll go amazingly for someone else!

This is my problem with it all. As frustrated and despairing as I am with him and his injury record, I'd still much rather he lined up for us than against us. (And you could put good money on him never missing his games vs saints for the next 10 years!) it's a dilemma that's for sure, I wouldn't blame saints either way (that said I'm sure the masses will cause outcry if he goes and plays against us/ he stays and continues his injury run)

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:08 pm  

He can't be on a ton of money so for a 3rd half he brings quality when available

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:26 pm  

bewareshadows wrote:

He can't be on a ton of money so for a 3rd half he brings quality when available

but when's that?

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:30 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

but when's that?

Practically never

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:59 pm  

Albion wrote:

Thompson and Greenwood look the pick of the young forwards atm. Those two should definitely get in the team and keep their place for Hudds.

Walker and Richards have done well but I think LMS and Amor will come in for both.

Savelio looked good with the ball but he didn't seem quite up to speed in defence. He'll probably come back in a couple of weeks.

I think laffranchi has been average so id drop him
In favour of one of the youngsters:

Amor
Roby
Masoe
Flanagan
Soliola
LMS

Walmsley
Thompson
Greenwood
Manu

I think thats a bit harsh, he has been much better this year with a better pack around him but I'm pretty certain this is his last year and I doubt we'll sign anyone to replace him directly rather his spot will be taken by one of the promising young lads

Re: Now for Hudds : Sun Mar 30, 2014 3:01 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

This is my problem with it all. As frustrated and despairing as I am with him and his injury record, I'd still much rather he lined up for us than against us. (And you could put good money on him never missing his games vs saints for the next 10 years!) it's a dilemma that's for sure, I wouldn't blame saints either way (that said I'm sure the masses will cause outcry if he goes and plays against us/ he stays and continues his injury run)

Given his unbelievably poor injury record (and Brown's comments about his professionalism) anyone with any sense would understand if Saints cut him loose. If he comes back to haunt us, so be it (Wigan may come sniffing again).