[Frosties.]

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:28 pm  

If you don't use the early guilty plea and go to red hall, you automatically lose it I believe.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:31 pm  

Rommel wrote:

Your all forgeting the EARLY GUILTY PLEA is it worth using for this match or save it incase we need him later in season? (assuming he's guilty)

Can't be used after a guilty offence has been issued - he either uses it now, or loses it if found guilty.

Grade A reckless tackle to appease the outcry of it's not fair east of the penines, 0-1 games, egp = £300 fine good as you like.

Just had a look at Wilkin, last used the egp 11 months 1 week ago in the third week of April so doesn't qualify

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:34 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

My concern with reshuffling again is that there are no kickers in that team, which is why I'd feel compelled to give charnock the nod.

I reckon Wheelers got more of a kicking game than we give him credit for.

No chance of Charnock getting the nod at this point, not if he wasn't involved against Wakey imo.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:53 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I reckon Wheelers got more of a kicking game than we give him credit for.

No chance of Charnock getting the nod at this point, not if he wasn't involved against Wakey imo.

I'd only say charnock should get involved if Wilkin is out (which is anyone's guess at this moment!) - wheeler and charnock would be a good combo imo I agree wheeler has an okay to good kicking game (though I do worry his leg will fly further than the ball) but I wouldn't want to rely on him for a game like Leeds. I'd say charnock is physically developed enough, and if we can let Nathan Ashe have a go why not dougie? It's better than being too 1 dimensional!

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:12 pm  

Magic Superbeetle wrote:

Of course, it's worth baring in mind, that given the lack of facilities at BV there's only gonna be a couple of camera angles at best, and who knows what they'll show.

Classy as.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:30 pm  

Both Amor and Wilkin charged with grade B offences. Amor has an EGP, Wilkin does not http://www.superleague.co.uk/article/29 ... rs-charged

Both Amor and Wilkin charged with grade B offences. Amor has an EGP, Wilkin does not http://www.superleague.co.uk/article/29 ... rs-charged

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:31 pm  

Albion wrote:

Both Amor and Wilkin charged with grade B offences.

Amor has an EGP, Wilkin does not

Wello at HB for Leeds then.

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:35 pm  

Got no chance on Friday now. Could get messy

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:40 pm  

Albion wrote:

Got no chance on Friday now. Could get messy

doesnt mean they'll get banned

Re: Amor to be banned? : Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:42 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

doesnt mean they'll get banned

I'd be amazed if Wilkin doesn't get banned. Was right in front of me that one and it was nasty. Amor EGP would mean he's back for Hudds hopefully