We can be bold enough to make a stand and do battle for our views and beliefs. But we must strive to be mature enough not to resort to unnecessary personal attacks upon people with opposing views.
What's worse is that they ban everyone from posting on their site, then criticise the Saints fans who haven't responded to Rogues post.
I was banned from C&W for laughing. My ban is longer than many murder charges and a true miscarriage of justice. Perhaps Rogues himself could lobby for my unbanning given the fact that he likes to post on here so much and they won't let me post on C&W?
We can be bold enough to make a stand and do battle for our views and beliefs. But we must strive to be mature enough not to resort to unnecessary personal attacks upon people with opposing views.
What's worse is that they ban everyone from posting on their site, then criticise the Saints fans who haven't responded to Rogues post.
I was banned from C&W for laughing. My ban is longer than many murder charges and a true miscarriage of justice. Perhaps Rogues himself could lobby for my unbanning given the fact that he likes to post on here so much and they won't let me post on C&W?
To be fair Saddened you must be picking up bans a bit like perry at the moment. Didn't you get a ban from here too.
To be fair Saddened you must be picking up bans a bit like perry at the moment. Didn't you get a ban from here too.
Not from here. I had messages of support from all the mods on here. It was a global ban from the highest powers in the land.
My ban from Cherry & White was enforced probably 5 years or more. It happened when there was a 'post your best picture memories of Central Park' thread. Someone posted a picture of a Tesco shop front and I posted a ' ' and was banned. A few of their mods have said they didn't do it and have tried to get me unbanned, but the ban remains.
I've contacted Nelson Mandela about it a few times. The Dhali Lhama is also looking into it.
Rogues knows more about rugby league than 97% of the posters on here.
It's ok to be afraid of that.
What he is good at is getting up your noses because he is a Wiganer. If you ignored his OBVIOUS (and they are) troll attempts and paid attention to him when he is talking sense, he'd stop doing it. If you laughed with him rather than try and take him on, he'd do it too.
Rogues knows more about rugby league than 97% of the posters on here.
It's ok to be afraid of that.
What he is good at is getting up your noses because he is a Wiganer. If you ignored his OBVIOUS (and they are) troll attempts and paid attention to him when he is talking sense, he'd stop doing it. If you laughed with him rather than try and take him on, he'd do it too.
I agree, I like Rogues. I picture an old man chuckling to himself somewhere in a St Helens council area.
Rogues is a brilliant guy who should be respected! He will help you out if you need any help. He helped me (obsessive Saint) so much and if it comes off I'll be forever greatfull!
He loves Wigan and dislikes Saints just like vice versa with us lot.
...is anthing other than a two faced biased one eyed TROLL (who likes to post pretending he has even a smidgen of neutralty in his meat and potato flavoured blood)
FWIW I still think Eastmond has more natural talent than the dummy spitter Tomkins , I still think Mike McIlorum is average (at best) and I've no idea how Goulding has ever played international RL
Give over! If those posters hadn't wanted to be quoted when their 'predictions' turned out to be the absolute garbage that most self respecting rugby fans knew them to be, they should try refrainining from posting every little bit of ar*e gravy that pops into their minds!
Great thread that produced a few laughs. No more, no less....
As for your assertion re: Eastmond. Leaving aside the fact that you're as entitled to your wrong opininion as the next man, I could pretty much make the same claim for Karl Pryce. Natural ability in abundance (although I reckon the sky will darken with all the flying pigs before he ever shows more than a momentary glimpse of it! lol). Funnily enough I could draw other parallels to Eastmond as well but I'm sure you're intelligent enough to work out what they are for yourself! To even mention him in the same breath as Tomkins as a Rugby League player is like comparing Shaun Edwards to Simon Haughton!
No1 Saint wrote:
...is anthing other than a two faced biased one eyed TROLL (who likes to post pretending he has even a smidgen of neutralty in his meat and potato flavoured blood)
FWIW I still think Eastmond has more natural talent than the dummy spitter Tomkins , I still think Mike McIlorum is average (at best) and I've no idea how Goulding has ever played international RL
Give over! If those posters hadn't wanted to be quoted when their 'predictions' turned out to be the absolute garbage that most self respecting rugby fans knew them to be, they should try refrainining from posting every little bit of ar*e gravy that pops into their minds!
Great thread that produced a few laughs. No more, no less....
As for your assertion re: Eastmond. Leaving aside the fact that you're as entitled to your wrong opininion as the next man, I could pretty much make the same claim for Karl Pryce. Natural ability in abundance (although I reckon the sky will darken with all the flying pigs before he ever shows more than a momentary glimpse of it! lol). Funnily enough I could draw other parallels to Eastmond as well but I'm sure you're intelligent enough to work out what they are for yourself! To even mention him in the same breath as Tomkins as a Rugby League player is like comparing Shaun Edwards to Simon Haughton!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 199 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...
To even mention him in the same breath as Tomkins as a Rugby League player is like comparing Shaun Edwards to Simon Haughton!
