Re: Dominique Peyroux : Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:02 pm  

SomersetSaint wrote:

The way he was played as a bal handler last game maybe points that way, but I just don't get it. Wilkin is a natural 13, or the closest thing we have got to one, and yet we play anyone there but him. LMS has played well at 13 as an extra prop, but I wish we would go back to having a proper LF there. Bring back the days of Harry Pinner, Arky, Shane Cooper, Scully. Leave turner in the centre where he has been ok this year.

My thoughts exacctly, they need to stop messing with Turner and just coach him to improve his defence.
Dom is a replacement for Jones not Turner, if next season Dom turns out a better option at centre then OK but don,t mess with our best attacking player as we come to the business end of this year.

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:49 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

His name is very feminine

So should we only recruit people with "hard" masculine names now then? Stacey Jones seemed to manage alright, and wasn't there a Tracey played for one of the NRL clubs a few years back?

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Mon Aug 31, 2015 8:29 pm  

Harry Pinner wrote:

So should we only recruit people with "hard" masculine names now then? Stacey Jones seemed to manage alright, and wasn't there a Tracey played for one of the NRL clubs a few years back?

Yeah, appearances are very important. We need a coach who looks cool in shades in Castleford in March and players who would scare people on a Russian building site.

Did anyone see Peyroux's performance this weekend? I've reassessed him and am now convinced he's the worst overseas signing we've ever made. I'd love to hear who's idea it was to sign him. He looks like a rabbit in the headlights, like he's 17 and has never played the game once. He's got that look Maurie had when he first signed, only without the excuse of never having played the game. His defense is absolutely appalling. He is consistently beaten by anyone stepping to his left and he has no physicality in the tackle at all. With the he looks petrified, darting about making exaggerated dummies until he's tackled. He never takes it in hard and in the three games I've seen he's not done a thing worthy of note.

I'm baffled as to why Jones couldn't have been replaced from the academy? Spend some of the considerable money it's taken to relocate Peyroux on a proper signing that might improve us. Peyroux is another Dawson. He'll play due to injuries, but he shouldn't be anywhere near the club. Our standards have definitely lowered.

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:12 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

I'm baffled as to why Jones couldn't have been replaced from the academy?

Like WHO?

Josh Jones is a fully mature professional. You reach physical maturity somewhere between 22 and 23. Which academy player can we promote who will be physically mature next season?

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Tue Sep 01, 2015 7:48 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Did anyone see Peyroux's performance this weekend? I've reassessed him and am now convinced he's the worst overseas signing we've ever made.

You mustn't have watched Saints during the eighties and early nineties, then. I could pick an entire thirteen in which Peyroux would likely be the star man.

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Tue Sep 01, 2015 8:03 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

You mustn't have watched Saints during the eighties and early nineties, then. I could pick an entire thirteen in which Peyroux would likely be the star man.

And combined they probably cost less than Peyroux and did need to be flown over and given a Mike Rush house to live in.

Prepared to give him a chance but he has all the tell tale signs of a complete dud.

At best he could become a Flannery which is not much of compliment.
A Derek McVey , Freddie T , George Mann, Apollo he ain't.

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Tue Sep 01, 2015 9:14 pm  

Gerry Mander wrote:

And combined they probably cost less than Peyroux and did need to be flown over and given a Mike Rush house to live in.

Prepared to give him a chance but he has all the tell tale signs of a complete dud.

At best he could become a Flannery which is not much of compliment.
A Derek McVey , Freddie T , George Mann, Apollo he ain't.

To be honest, I'm not sure he needs to be up to Flannery's standard to fulfill his obligations. Bear in mind that Flannery was an experienced State of Origin player with a solid track record in the NRL.

I'm completely baffled why a guy we are getting on the cheap to replace a bit-part player whose recent form scarcely warrants first team inclusion can generate page after page of outrage.

Before damning Peyroux before he's played so much as a game people really need to think seriously about Josh Jones' current standard of rugby. There isn't a cat in hell's chance that Jones (at his current level) would be a first team player at the Warriors.

If we've signed a guy the Warriors are prepared to play first grade (no matter his performance) - then it tells me Saints have bought a better player for wages they weren't prepared to give Jones. In other words - a win.

But seriously, we're talking about perhaps the 20-oddth most important player in a Saints shirt next season. Talk about outrage overkill...

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:08 am  

Saddened! wrote:

I'd love to hear who's idea it was to sign him.

Sean Long

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Wed Sep 02, 2015 10:26 am  

Chances are that Longy has a better eye for talent then I do. But from what I have seen so far I haven't noticed anything impressive, and I say that as someone generally quite positive about the club

Re: Dominique Peyroux : Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:52 am  

Saint #1 wrote:

Chances are that Longy has a better eye for talent then I do. But from what I have seen so far I haven't noticed anything impressive, and I say that as someone generally quite positive about the club

Presumably Long has worked with him in the Samoa setup in the last couple of years, so probably knows him pretty well.

You never know with these overseas lads, some come big reputations and big wage bills and fail to deliver, whereas some come with no expectation and turn out to be outstanding signings. Many more, of course, come with no reputation and turn out to be turnips.