Re: Chris Hill ???? : Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:26 pm
Gazwire wrote:
Things change from maurice lindsey in the late 80's to early 90's and then to mcmanaus and the chap at leeds who ever since iv'e watched rl has tried to
buy leeds the title, even signing doug laughton and ellery hanley to no effect. saints have always had good backing and a strong foot in the transfer
market especially in the sl era. if you look at the sides saints have had over the sl period then you also could question the money they were on.
yes there was some home bred players, but those players matured into world class players and i'm sure kc wouldn't be happy on a
'how you doing thatto heath' salary when bought in players would have been on much more.
buy leeds the title, even signing doug laughton and ellery hanley to no effect. saints have always had good backing and a strong foot in the transfer
market especially in the sl era. if you look at the sides saints have had over the sl period then you also could question the money they were on.
yes there was some home bred players, but those players matured into world class players and i'm sure kc wouldn't be happy on a
'how you doing thatto heath' salary when bought in players would have been on much more.
Yeah, obviously the performance warps the perception of things. If Warrington dropped to third or fourth next season no one would be questioning their cap spend.